Jefferson Morley

I think it makes it easier for any whistleblowers to come forward. And I'd like to say, if there are people out there who have access to classified information, consult your lawyer. But I think President Trump's order effectively, well, it reduces their risk about talking about things that are classified. Because the president's saying, we want all of this out. That carries some weight.

So that in itself is an important development.

So that in itself is an important development.

So that in itself is an important development.

Yeah, that was an amazing story. And it goes to show you that, you know, talking about this stuff... you can be threatened with legal action. That's still possible. So that threat needs to be removed. And I hope the president's order has done that, and that people can feel that this is perfectly legitimate to talk about.

Yeah, that was an amazing story. And it goes to show you that, you know, talking about this stuff... you can be threatened with legal action. That's still possible. So that threat needs to be removed. And I hope the president's order has done that, and that people can feel that this is perfectly legitimate to talk about.

Yeah, that was an amazing story. And it goes to show you that, you know, talking about this stuff... you can be threatened with legal action. That's still possible. So that threat needs to be removed. And I hope the president's order has done that, and that people can feel that this is perfectly legitimate to talk about.

There are no real national security concerns in this material, except for the fact that the assassination of a president is a national security concern, right?

There are no real national security concerns in this material, except for the fact that the assassination of a president is a national security concern, right?

There are no real national security concerns in this material, except for the fact that the assassination of a president is a national security concern, right?

Yeah. So another story, which I reported on JFK facts last year. Before President Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963, the CIA had Lee Harvey Oswald under surveillance for four years. By November 21st, 1963, they had compiled 180 pages of material on Oswald.

Yeah. So another story, which I reported on JFK facts last year. Before President Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963, the CIA had Lee Harvey Oswald under surveillance for four years. By November 21st, 1963, they had compiled 180 pages of material on Oswald.

Yeah. So another story, which I reported on JFK facts last year. Before President Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963, the CIA had Lee Harvey Oswald under surveillance for four years. By November 21st, 1963, they had compiled 180 pages of material on Oswald.

His personal life, his political beliefs, his contact with a KGB officer, his arrest, they had all of that at the time Kennedy was leaving for Dallas. CIA counterintelligence chief James Angleton knew that Oswald was in the Dallas area in the first week of November of 1963. That pre-assassination Oswald file was not completely declassified until April 2023. That's how sensitive this is.

His personal life, his political beliefs, his contact with a KGB officer, his arrest, they had all of that at the time Kennedy was leaving for Dallas. CIA counterintelligence chief James Angleton knew that Oswald was in the Dallas area in the first week of November of 1963. That pre-assassination Oswald file was not completely declassified until April 2023. That's how sensitive this is.

His personal life, his political beliefs, his contact with a KGB officer, his arrest, they had all of that at the time Kennedy was leaving for Dallas. CIA counterintelligence chief James Angleton knew that Oswald was in the Dallas area in the first week of November of 1963. That pre-assassination Oswald file was not completely declassified until April 2023. That's how sensitive this is.

And they're very good at keeping this stuff off the public record. And, you know, now when you go to people in in the mainstream media, they won't report on Oswald's pre-assassination file. They'll say, oh, they were just covering their asses. They make excuses for the CIA instead of saying, hey, you had 180 pages on the guy.

And they're very good at keeping this stuff off the public record. And, you know, now when you go to people in in the mainstream media, they won't report on Oswald's pre-assassination file. They'll say, oh, they were just covering their asses. They make excuses for the CIA instead of saying, hey, you had 180 pages on the guy.

And they're very good at keeping this stuff off the public record. And, you know, now when you go to people in in the mainstream media, they won't report on Oswald's pre-assassination file. They'll say, oh, they were just covering their asses. They make excuses for the CIA instead of saying, hey, you had 180 pages on the guy.

You know, was that extreme negligence, intentional negligence or actual complicity? You know, and we don't we don't know. But that file is the pre-assassination Oswald file is one of the most significant things to come out in recent years, for sure.