Jefferson Morley

So that alone is kind of indisputable factual evidence of a deficiency at a minimum in the official story. So also, I think, you know, in the long and I'm not an expert on RFK assassination, but when you see how CIA assassination operations worked and the kind of techniques that they used, you can't rule out that Sirhan was under some kind of mind control program.

So that alone is kind of indisputable factual evidence of a deficiency at a minimum in the official story. So also, I think, you know, in the long and I'm not an expert on RFK assassination, but when you see how CIA assassination operations worked and the kind of techniques that they used, you can't rule out that Sirhan was under some kind of mind control program.

So that alone is kind of indisputable factual evidence of a deficiency at a minimum in the official story. So also, I think, you know, in the long and I'm not an expert on RFK assassination, but when you see how CIA assassination operations worked and the kind of techniques that they used, you can't rule out that Sirhan was under some kind of mind control program.

I mean, they had a mind control program, and it was designed to do things like this. Commit an act, and you have no memory of it. So we know they were working on that technology. Could it have been applied here? That's why we need the records, so that we can assess, is that a real possibility?

I mean, they had a mind control program, and it was designed to do things like this. Commit an act, and you have no memory of it. So we know they were working on that technology. Could it have been applied here? That's why we need the records, so that we can assess, is that a real possibility?

I mean, they had a mind control program, and it was designed to do things like this. Commit an act, and you have no memory of it. So we know they were working on that technology. Could it have been applied here? That's why we need the records, so that we can assess, is that a real possibility?

Yeah. I mean, it's a striking detail.

Yeah. I mean, it's a striking detail.

Yeah. I mean, it's a striking detail.

Yeah. I mean, the the problem that they have is that. I don't have a conspiracy theory. So the label of conspiracy theorist just doesn't apply. And the other thing is, you know, nobody can deny the stuff that I'm talking about. Let me mention another JFK document that's very important and I think will interest you.

Yeah. I mean, the the problem that they have is that. I don't have a conspiracy theory. So the label of conspiracy theorist just doesn't apply. And the other thing is, you know, nobody can deny the stuff that I'm talking about. Let me mention another JFK document that's very important and I think will interest you.

Yeah. I mean, the the problem that they have is that. I don't have a conspiracy theory. So the label of conspiracy theorist just doesn't apply. And the other thing is, you know, nobody can deny the stuff that I'm talking about. Let me mention another JFK document that's very important and I think will interest you.

One of the things that's withheld and is in the JFK collection right now is the testimony of James Angleton in 1975 to the church committee about the Israeli nuclear program. This is a 113-page document, and it's heavily redacted to this day, and the redactions clearly pertain to Israel. Now, is this an assassination-related document? Absolutely.

One of the things that's withheld and is in the JFK collection right now is the testimony of James Angleton in 1975 to the church committee about the Israeli nuclear program. This is a 113-page document, and it's heavily redacted to this day, and the redactions clearly pertain to Israel. Now, is this an assassination-related document? Absolutely.

One of the things that's withheld and is in the JFK collection right now is the testimony of James Angleton in 1975 to the church committee about the Israeli nuclear program. This is a 113-page document, and it's heavily redacted to this day, and the redactions clearly pertain to Israel. Now, is this an assassination-related document? Absolutely.

The Assassination Records Review Board said this is an assassination-related document. It meets the statutory definition, okay? If the president and this effort are serious, that testimony will be declassified because Angleton controlled the Oswald file on the one hand, and he was in contact with the Israelis on the other. So it belongs in the public record.

The Assassination Records Review Board said this is an assassination-related document. It meets the statutory definition, okay? If the president and this effort are serious, that testimony will be declassified because Angleton controlled the Oswald file on the one hand, and he was in contact with the Israelis on the other. So it belongs in the public record.

The Assassination Records Review Board said this is an assassination-related document. It meets the statutory definition, okay? If the president and this effort are serious, that testimony will be declassified because Angleton controlled the Oswald file on the one hand, and he was in contact with the Israelis on the other. So it belongs in the public record.

That's another test of, is this serious effort?

That's another test of, is this serious effort?