Jefferson Morley

Interestingly enough, he was not questioned about Oswald because even the church committee did not know the extent of the pre-assassination surveillance of Oswald. That's only something we've learned since the 1990s.

Interestingly enough, he was not questioned about Oswald because even the church committee did not know the extent of the pre-assassination surveillance of Oswald. That's only something we've learned since the 1990s.

Yeah, basically, he dropped the demand for on-site inspections. He dropped the demand that AIPAC be classified as a domestic lobby. And, you know, there was really no accountability after that. And the story only emerged, you know, 10 years later when the church committee started pressing Angleton for some explanations.

Yeah, basically, he dropped the demand for on-site inspections. He dropped the demand that AIPAC be classified as a domestic lobby. And, you know, there was really no accountability after that. And the story only emerged, you know, 10 years later when the church committee started pressing Angleton for some explanations.

Yeah, basically, he dropped the demand for on-site inspections. He dropped the demand that AIPAC be classified as a domestic lobby. And, you know, there was really no accountability after that. And the story only emerged, you know, 10 years later when the church committee started pressing Angleton for some explanations.

Yeah, and this is a tough call for the president because he's going to get very strong pushback from his national security apparatus supported by the CIA, supported by – Israeli interests to say, no, you can't talk about that. That's not permitted. You know, you can't don't do that.

Yeah, and this is a tough call for the president because he's going to get very strong pushback from his national security apparatus supported by the CIA, supported by – Israeli interests to say, no, you can't talk about that. That's not permitted. You know, you can't don't do that.

Yeah, and this is a tough call for the president because he's going to get very strong pushback from his national security apparatus supported by the CIA, supported by – Israeli interests to say, no, you can't talk about that. That's not permitted. You know, you can't don't do that.

Like I say, there's some very clear benchmarks to figure out. Is this working or not? And, you know, are people holding up the process and and obstructing the president's wishes or are they, you know, are they really going along? And so the proof is in the pudding. You know, the president's sentiment is great. It's great that a president has committed to this.

Like I say, there's some very clear benchmarks to figure out. Is this working or not? And, you know, are people holding up the process and and obstructing the president's wishes or are they, you know, are they really going along? And so the proof is in the pudding. You know, the president's sentiment is great. It's great that a president has committed to this.

Like I say, there's some very clear benchmarks to figure out. Is this working or not? And, you know, are people holding up the process and and obstructing the president's wishes or are they, you know, are they really going along? And so the proof is in the pudding. You know, the president's sentiment is great. It's great that a president has committed to this.

It's amazing that no president has committed in this way before. But we'll take it. I'm not I'm not a supporter of President Trump. But on this issue, he's absolutely right. And we need to follow through on what he said.

It's amazing that no president has committed in this way before. But we'll take it. I'm not I'm not a supporter of President Trump. But on this issue, he's absolutely right. And we need to follow through on what he said.

It's amazing that no president has committed in this way before. But we'll take it. I'm not I'm not a supporter of President Trump. But on this issue, he's absolutely right. And we need to follow through on what he said.