Jen Psaki

Nine people, as you document, nine people familiar with the information that was submitted to the FBI and the DOJ in recent years told you they were alarmed that lots of documents that they know to exist, including some that reference Trump, were not made public.

Now, I guess I'm I'm trying to figure out, were they alarmed about the 50 pages or so that are reportedly under wraps and that describe an accusation that Donald Trump sexually abused a minor?

Or they alarmed about the concept that documents are withheld or other documents entirely?

Do you have any sense of that?

You've reported on Jeffrey Epstein and his crimes and the young survivors for a really long time, I think closing in on a decade.

This piece outlines how White House staff members were entirely unprepared for the Epstein files release and the tens of thousands of times that Donald Trump's name was actually mentioned in the documents that were actually released.

I guess my question is, did it surprise you that they were surprised?

Yeah, I mean, just conceptually, you'd think they'd know, right?

It did surprise me.

Sarah, thank you for your reporting.

We appreciate you, Sarah Fitzpatrick, reporting in the Atlantic.

All right.

I want to turn to the Democratic Congressman Suhas Subramaniam.

He's a member of the House Oversight Committee, and he was in the room for that deposition of former President Bill Clinton today.

Congressman, good to see you.

Thank you for being with us.

I want to before I get to the Bill Clinton stuff, I want to just get your thoughts on Sarah Fitzpatrick's reporting about the White House being sort of unclear on what Donald Trump's exposure to this whole thing and sort of seeming flat footed and very concerned about it.

Let's talk about today and the testimony from Bill Clinton.

What can you tell us without having to kill me?

Are you able to tell me if there were any specific questions?