Jenner Furst

And so it creates a weapon... a pandemic that has never been seen by man before and arguably carries more risk than it carries benefit. And Fauci was almost evangelical about this research to the point that it was suspicious. And scientists like Richard Ebright and others, the Cambridge Working Group, I mean, the debate started almost directly after anthrax and Fauci began doing this research.

And so it creates a weapon... a pandemic that has never been seen by man before and arguably carries more risk than it carries benefit. And Fauci was almost evangelical about this research to the point that it was suspicious. And scientists like Richard Ebright and others, the Cambridge Working Group, I mean, the debate started almost directly after anthrax and Fauci began doing this research.

I mean, the debate started in like 2002. that we should not be directing all of our research dollars into this one narrow field of quote pandemic preparedness and yet fauci did and amassed so much influence and power in that system that he was able to shut down every critic and there were a lot of close calls and there were a lot of red flags you know after anthrax and before ebola

I mean, the debate started in like 2002. that we should not be directing all of our research dollars into this one narrow field of quote pandemic preparedness and yet fauci did and amassed so much influence and power in that system that he was able to shut down every critic and there were a lot of close calls and there were a lot of red flags you know after anthrax and before ebola

I mean, the debate started in like 2002. that we should not be directing all of our research dollars into this one narrow field of quote pandemic preparedness and yet fauci did and amassed so much influence and power in that system that he was able to shut down every critic and there were a lot of close calls and there were a lot of red flags you know after anthrax and before ebola

Fauci supported the engineering of avian flu in 2011 to make it airborne. Bird flu is not naturally airborne. It takes a while to transfer from its host birds to humans. It happens with pigs. It happens with other intermediate species. And a scientist supported by Anthony Fauci used gain-of-function techniques in order to hone the virus to be airborne in humans.

Fauci supported the engineering of avian flu in 2011 to make it airborne. Bird flu is not naturally airborne. It takes a while to transfer from its host birds to humans. It happens with pigs. It happens with other intermediate species. And a scientist supported by Anthony Fauci used gain-of-function techniques in order to hone the virus to be airborne in humans.

Fauci supported the engineering of avian flu in 2011 to make it airborne. Bird flu is not naturally airborne. It takes a while to transfer from its host birds to humans. It happens with pigs. It happens with other intermediate species. And a scientist supported by Anthony Fauci used gain-of-function techniques in order to hone the virus to be airborne in humans.

So this was celebrated by Fauci as a victory of science. There was a big debate on whether the results of this study should even be published. They were published. And Fauci and Francis Collins, who was also the NIH director at the time of the pandemic and very much part of the whole problem that we faced, they wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post and said that this was a flu risk worth taking.

So this was celebrated by Fauci as a victory of science. There was a big debate on whether the results of this study should even be published. They were published. And Fauci and Francis Collins, who was also the NIH director at the time of the pandemic and very much part of the whole problem that we faced, they wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post and said that this was a flu risk worth taking.

So this was celebrated by Fauci as a victory of science. There was a big debate on whether the results of this study should even be published. They were published. And Fauci and Francis Collins, who was also the NIH director at the time of the pandemic and very much part of the whole problem that we faced, they wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post and said that this was a flu risk worth taking.

That doing this dangerous research could cause a pandemic, but that it was a risk worth taking because we would be prepared for that pandemic.

That doing this dangerous research could cause a pandemic, but that it was a risk worth taking because we would be prepared for that pandemic.

That doing this dangerous research could cause a pandemic, but that it was a risk worth taking because we would be prepared for that pandemic.

Yeah. And therein lies the next sort of issue is that I think clinicians, doctors who treat people, folks that are pragmatic, will take any remedy or any countermeasure that's effective to help their patients and would...

Yeah. And therein lies the next sort of issue is that I think clinicians, doctors who treat people, folks that are pragmatic, will take any remedy or any countermeasure that's effective to help their patients and would...

Yeah. And therein lies the next sort of issue is that I think clinicians, doctors who treat people, folks that are pragmatic, will take any remedy or any countermeasure that's effective to help their patients and would...

Humane, any way to stop suffering, anything, you know?

Humane, any way to stop suffering, anything, you know?

Humane, any way to stop suffering, anything, you know?