Jensen Huang

If that humanoid robot were to be created, is it more likely that the humanoid robot comes into my house and uses the tools that I have to do the work that it needs to do?

Or does this hand turn into a 10-pound hammer in one instance?

turns into a scalpel in another instance.

In order to boil water, it beams microwaves out of its fingers,

Or is it more likely just to use the microwave?

And the first time it goes up to the microwave, it probably doesn't know how to use it.

But that's okay.

It's connected to the internet.

It reads the manual of this microwave, reads it, instantly becomes an expert.

And so it uses it.

And so I think the, I just described, in fact, almost all of the

properties of open claw you know that it's going to use tools that it's going to access files it's going to be able to do research it has io subsystem and when you're done reasoning through it reasoning about it through it in that way um then you say oh my gosh the impact to the future computing is deeply profound and the reason for that is i think we've just reinvented the computer

And then now you say, okay, when did we reason about that?

When did we reason about open claw?

If you take the open claw schematic that I used at GTC, you will find it two years ago.

Literally two years ago at GTC, I was talking about agentic systems that exactly reflect OpenClaw today.

And of course, the confluence of many things had to happen.

First of all, we needed Cloud and GPT and all of these models to reach a level of capability.

So their innovation and their breakthroughs and their continued advances was really important.

And then, of course, somebody had to create an open source, you know, project that was sufficiently robust, you know, and sufficiently complete and that we can all put to work.