Jess Weatherbed

And you should maybe feel bad if it's not or that you're less if you're not able to take stunning images like that. And ever since we've had these filtering applications, which were incredibly limited, you could make yourself have smoother skin, maybe slimmer jawline. They weren't massive changes.

And you should maybe feel bad if it's not or that you're less if you're not able to take stunning images like that. And ever since we've had these filtering applications, which were incredibly limited, you could make yourself have smoother skin, maybe slimmer jawline. They weren't massive changes.

I think it's become this kind of thing that if we're given a tool now that can effectively run with the limits of our imagination, people are going to do so.

I think it's become this kind of thing that if we're given a tool now that can effectively run with the limits of our imagination, people are going to do so.

I think it's become this kind of thing that if we're given a tool now that can effectively run with the limits of our imagination, people are going to do so.

I think if we're talking about this specific conversation, there's definitely a line. If we're saying Photoshop itself, that was a revolutionary technology, right? That was what we're saying kicked all of this off on a digital aspect. Photo manipulation existed for way longer than that, but that was incredibly difficult. That wasn't just technical know-how, that was physical skills.

I think if we're talking about this specific conversation, there's definitely a line. If we're saying Photoshop itself, that was a revolutionary technology, right? That was what we're saying kicked all of this off on a digital aspect. Photo manipulation existed for way longer than that, but that was incredibly difficult. That wasn't just technical know-how, that was physical skills.

I think if we're talking about this specific conversation, there's definitely a line. If we're saying Photoshop itself, that was a revolutionary technology, right? That was what we're saying kicked all of this off on a digital aspect. Photo manipulation existed for way longer than that, but that was incredibly difficult. That wasn't just technical know-how, that was physical skills.

You had to know how to cut tiny little film rolls and be able to manipulate them in magnified kind of situations, whereas Photoshop enabled you to do that without having to have all the expensive tools. It was still expensive software, but it's gradually become more accessible. I completely agree with you.

You had to know how to cut tiny little film rolls and be able to manipulate them in magnified kind of situations, whereas Photoshop enabled you to do that without having to have all the expensive tools. It was still expensive software, but it's gradually become more accessible. I completely agree with you.

You had to know how to cut tiny little film rolls and be able to manipulate them in magnified kind of situations, whereas Photoshop enabled you to do that without having to have all the expensive tools. It was still expensive software, but it's gradually become more accessible. I completely agree with you.

There's a difference between almost manipulating something that had substance to begin with and just creating something that is a complete false reality. It never existed to begin with. And there's something to be said about intent there, which is why I think accessibility is one of the more significant concerns. Because even if you wanted to Photoshop an image or something, I don't know, like,

There's a difference between almost manipulating something that had substance to begin with and just creating something that is a complete false reality. It never existed to begin with. And there's something to be said about intent there, which is why I think accessibility is one of the more significant concerns. Because even if you wanted to Photoshop an image or something, I don't know, like,

There's a difference between almost manipulating something that had substance to begin with and just creating something that is a complete false reality. It never existed to begin with. And there's something to be said about intent there, which is why I think accessibility is one of the more significant concerns. Because even if you wanted to Photoshop an image or something, I don't know, like,

a lion in a playground or something, again, nefarious, you would usually do so for a giggle. Are you really going to have that much effort to learn all the necessary skills? Pick up the tech, again, free or paid, which is expensive if you want to go down that route. Go through all that effort for a joke.

a lion in a playground or something, again, nefarious, you would usually do so for a giggle. Are you really going to have that much effort to learn all the necessary skills? Pick up the tech, again, free or paid, which is expensive if you want to go down that route. Go through all that effort for a joke.

a lion in a playground or something, again, nefarious, you would usually do so for a giggle. Are you really going to have that much effort to learn all the necessary skills? Pick up the tech, again, free or paid, which is expensive if you want to go down that route. Go through all that effort for a joke.

for something that you think is going to be funny whereas now there isn't any effort required so the idea that you're changing an image with the fact that these two things are similar isn't a bad argument but it does completely ignore the fact that the accessibility and the scale of these things is the issue at hand not what's actually happening

for something that you think is going to be funny whereas now there isn't any effort required so the idea that you're changing an image with the fact that these two things are similar isn't a bad argument but it does completely ignore the fact that the accessibility and the scale of these things is the issue at hand not what's actually happening

for something that you think is going to be funny whereas now there isn't any effort required so the idea that you're changing an image with the fact that these two things are similar isn't a bad argument but it does completely ignore the fact that the accessibility and the scale of these things is the issue at hand not what's actually happening