Jim Colony

I think that much of a difference, no.

But I do think that a lot of people looked at Ohio State the last several years and saw the receivers and the skill positions around their quarterback as the best in the country by far.

Their receiver core has been incredible for a half decade now.

So I think the argument there is Howard beneficial.

But Indiana, they brought in guys who are now NFL quality receivers.

No doubt, yes.

And that whole program, it's going to yield so many NFL guys just because of the great success.

They're getting extended looks.

prove themselves but I think the argument with Ohio State is they have Jeremiah Smith or a few years ago Jackson Smith and Jigba all the great receivers they've had Harrison yes that it makes the quarterbacks look better than they really are if they were elsewhere well quarterbacks can make receivers look good too

John, what is the catch?

So one thing that I think is, and I did think likelies was a touchdown, by the way.

I did, too.

There's usually the requirement for a football move or a football act, as they call it, but sometimes there isn't.

Like if you're going out of bounds, you don't have to make a football move.

So even within different parts of the field, the rules are completely different.

For instance, getting into the end zone is different if you're a runner versus if you're receiving the ball.

So it just makes it way too complicated.

And you and I talked about this, Bob, during the last break.

For people who watch every single week and are very closely invested to the NFL, they don't know.

How are casual fans going to have any idea how to react to something when they don't know if it's going to be a catch, an interception, an incompletion?