Jim Kwik

But then there's a cost because then we're not taking the stairs where we could get some physical fitness.

And so I feel like, again, your mind, your brain is like use it or lose it.

If I put my arm in a sling for a year, it wouldn't stay the same.

And when it was stronger, it would atrophy.

And that's my concern because we're seeing right now, there was a study at MIT where students would take some kind of exam and they had chat GPT.

Others had Google search.

Others had to do original content.

And we see declines in working memory.

We see weakened critical thinking skills.

We're seeing shorter and shorter attention spans.

So it's the over-reliance on these external brains I'm concerned about, where AI is incredibly efficient, but where I feel like we have to make choices and who am I to say where that needle should go.

I don't want to replace effort.

you know, just like working out and exercise and physical fitness.

So I think tools should amplify our potential, amplify our impact in our intelligence, but not sedate it, not anesthetize it.

I'm going to err on human.

I am human, so it could be an error.

I think AI mixes.

But in terms of creativity, humans creating something new and originating a new thought, I like that.

Because I think creativity, again, AI is mixing things, but it's not necessarily originating new things.

And that's how I view creativity.