Jim Lampley

And even talking to it and asking a question and waiting for the response, that's inefficient in comparison to a human neural interface that allows you to instantaneously access large language models like that.

Not only that, but then why do we have a hundred and, I mean, how many different fucking languages do we have?

I don't even know.

Thousands?

Yeah.

And dialects and all of that.

How about one universal language that everybody with a chip gets?

And then boy, boy do we have a soup of ideas flowing around and no problem with language barriers, no problem with cultural barriers.

But then do you have a problem with the edge of who you are versus who the other person is?

I think that goes away.

I think that goes away and we become a hive mind.

I think that's ultimately the evolution of human beings.

And, look, I know you've done a lot of work with UAPs and the like, and I think you've done some really fantastic work.

And you're very objective in your analysis of what this whole situation is.

When I look at artificial intelligence and I look at this thing that's clearly taking place right now and I see what –

what human beings are like in comparison to what they used to be like, and especially when you look at ancient hominids.

The alien archetype, this thing that everybody sees, supposedly, or one of the many different ones, that kind of looks like what we seem to be going in the direction of being.

Which is one of the reasons why I find it so odd.

Does that make sense?

Right.