Jimmy Corsetti

And so it's like, with that being said, what's inside this hidden chamber? There could be a lost technology if it existed. There could be answers on how the pyramid was constructed because that's debated. Nobody knows how they constructed it. Maybe you go in there and be like, oh, so maybe this is how they were stacking those stones. Oh, you know, whatever. Maybe there's a pharaoh in there.

it and it'd be like oh yeah yeah and if it was for a tomb for the pharaoh what if there's a burial in there like there's so many answers that we could get by simply going in there and they can do it they can drill a small hole and send in you know an endoscope camera and they could figure it out in a very short period of time for not a lot of money without damaging the pyramid this is so doable

it and it'd be like oh yeah yeah and if it was for a tomb for the pharaoh what if there's a burial in there like there's so many answers that we could get by simply going in there and they can do it they can drill a small hole and send in you know an endoscope camera and they could figure it out in a very short period of time for not a lot of money without damaging the pyramid this is so doable

it and it'd be like oh yeah yeah and if it was for a tomb for the pharaoh what if there's a burial in there like there's so many answers that we could get by simply going in there and they can do it they can drill a small hole and send in you know an endoscope camera and they could figure it out in a very short period of time for not a lot of money without damaging the pyramid this is so doable

And, you know, we can be we can have all this conjecture about what it was, how it was built, what was, you know. And it's like, but maybe we just go in there and look, we'll find we'll learn something. And that answers some of these questions.

And, you know, we can be we can have all this conjecture about what it was, how it was built, what was, you know. And it's like, but maybe we just go in there and look, we'll find we'll learn something. And that answers some of these questions.

And, you know, we can be we can have all this conjecture about what it was, how it was built, what was, you know. And it's like, but maybe we just go in there and look, we'll find we'll learn something. And that answers some of these questions.

Everything about that thing is, has to be by design. Cause like the, the mathematics to get it to be as symmetrical as it is all the way to the top, it requires it. Cause like if they're off anywhere, you know, could screw up the whole thing.

Everything about that thing is, has to be by design. Cause like the, the mathematics to get it to be as symmetrical as it is all the way to the top, it requires it. Cause like if they're off anywhere, you know, could screw up the whole thing.

Everything about that thing is, has to be by design. Cause like the, the mathematics to get it to be as symmetrical as it is all the way to the top, it requires it. Cause like if they're off anywhere, you know, could screw up the whole thing.

Within a half inch. Within a half fucking inch. 755 feet long at each of its bases. And not only that, like so it's like you can a lot of skyscrapers might face north, south, east and west. This is within a degree of accuracy that's more accurate than a lot of our modern buildings that are meant to face the cardinal points. Right. Which is amazing.

Within a half inch. Within a half fucking inch. 755 feet long at each of its bases. And not only that, like so it's like you can a lot of skyscrapers might face north, south, east and west. This is within a degree of accuracy that's more accurate than a lot of our modern buildings that are meant to face the cardinal points. Right. Which is amazing.

Within a half inch. Within a half fucking inch. 755 feet long at each of its bases. And not only that, like so it's like you can a lot of skyscrapers might face north, south, east and west. This is within a degree of accuracy that's more accurate than a lot of our modern buildings that are meant to face the cardinal points. Right. Which is amazing.

It's not perfectly perfectly, but it's in a few degrees of accuracy, like a super – like a very small level. It's basically perfect as far as the eye can see.

It's not perfectly perfectly, but it's in a few degrees of accuracy, like a super – like a very small level. It's basically perfect as far as the eye can see.

It's not perfectly perfectly, but it's in a few degrees of accuracy, like a super – like a very small level. It's basically perfect as far as the eye can see.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

And to be fair, when I said that Christopher Dunn is the one that I identify most, I haven't done a deep dive on Land of Chem's theory. I figured that next time I go to Giza, I'd link up with him personally and get right from him. So I can't say that – when I say about Christopher Dunn, that's not taking anything away from Land of Chem because I'm not – I can't speak to his theory.