Jimmy Corsetti

And so here's the theory that I would if I had to suggest is that everyone's correct, that with that pole shift, it caused a diminishment of the Earth's shields, the atmosphere diminished, which made us more susceptible to solar activity as well as cosmic impacts. And if the pole shift happened, let's say 12,800 years ago, and then maybe 11,600 years ago, there was the cosmic impact.

And so here's the theory that I would if I had to suggest is that everyone's correct, that with that pole shift, it caused a diminishment of the Earth's shields, the atmosphere diminished, which made us more susceptible to solar activity as well as cosmic impacts. And if the pole shift happened, let's say 12,800 years ago, and then maybe 11,600 years ago, there was the cosmic impact.

And so here's the theory that I would if I had to suggest is that everyone's correct, that with that pole shift, it caused a diminishment of the Earth's shields, the atmosphere diminished, which made us more susceptible to solar activity as well as cosmic impacts. And if the pole shift happened, let's say 12,800 years ago, and then maybe 11,600 years ago, there was the cosmic impact.

And somewhere in between, there was a solar outburst because the Earth's surface will be more susceptible to solar activity as well as cosmic impacts. What if it's all three of them? Which I'm sorry to say, that means that the Earth is far – if this was true, the Earth is far more volatile than any of us even want to believe.

And somewhere in between, there was a solar outburst because the Earth's surface will be more susceptible to solar activity as well as cosmic impacts. What if it's all three of them? Which I'm sorry to say, that means that the Earth is far – if this was true, the Earth is far more volatile than any of us even want to believe.

And somewhere in between, there was a solar outburst because the Earth's surface will be more susceptible to solar activity as well as cosmic impacts. What if it's all three of them? Which I'm sorry to say, that means that the Earth is far – if this was true, the Earth is far more volatile than any of us even want to believe.

That means that like there is periods of time in Earth's history where it's like – really, really bad. But that would explain why all we have left is stone in these unanswered questions, that it's so much worse than people imagine.

That means that like there is periods of time in Earth's history where it's like – really, really bad. But that would explain why all we have left is stone in these unanswered questions, that it's so much worse than people imagine.

That means that like there is periods of time in Earth's history where it's like – really, really bad. But that would explain why all we have left is stone in these unanswered questions, that it's so much worse than people imagine.

And although Ben Davidson doesn't identify with continental crust displacement, it's still possible that during a pole shift, if it's caused by the internal movement of the iron core in the middle, the liquid iron core, and then the liquid molten core that's in the mantle, it's said that that's what causes a pole shift, is that it's the movement of the iron core. It's already soft.

And although Ben Davidson doesn't identify with continental crust displacement, it's still possible that during a pole shift, if it's caused by the internal movement of the iron core in the middle, the liquid iron core, and then the liquid molten core that's in the mantle, it's said that that's what causes a pole shift, is that it's the movement of the iron core. It's already soft.

And although Ben Davidson doesn't identify with continental crust displacement, it's still possible that during a pole shift, if it's caused by the internal movement of the iron core in the middle, the liquid iron core, and then the liquid molten core that's in the mantle, it's said that that's what causes a pole shift, is that it's the movement of the iron core. It's already soft.

It's liquid, but it moves. And essentially, it's a difference between a full-on pole flip, which does happen occasionally in Earth's history, but geomagnetic pole excursions, which are a partial pole flip, happen intermittently. Not consistently, but there's evidence of going back every 12,000 to 13,000 years. I'm going to make a compelling video on this in the next couple months.

It's liquid, but it moves. And essentially, it's a difference between a full-on pole flip, which does happen occasionally in Earth's history, but geomagnetic pole excursions, which are a partial pole flip, happen intermittently. Not consistently, but there's evidence of going back every 12,000 to 13,000 years. I'm going to make a compelling video on this in the next couple months.

It's liquid, but it moves. And essentially, it's a difference between a full-on pole flip, which does happen occasionally in Earth's history, but geomagnetic pole excursions, which are a partial pole flip, happen intermittently. Not consistently, but there's evidence of going back every 12,000 to 13,000 years. I'm going to make a compelling video on this in the next couple months.

But basically, the idea is that if... Let me give you an example that we can all wrap our heads around is earthquakes. Some earthquakes originate in the crust when there is movement in the crust and it causes an earthquake. And others originate in the liquid outer portion of the mantle. If something happens inside the Earth's core and we're floating on top of it...

But basically, the idea is that if... Let me give you an example that we can all wrap our heads around is earthquakes. Some earthquakes originate in the crust when there is movement in the crust and it causes an earthquake. And others originate in the liquid outer portion of the mantle. If something happens inside the Earth's core and we're floating on top of it...

But basically, the idea is that if... Let me give you an example that we can all wrap our heads around is earthquakes. Some earthquakes originate in the crust when there is movement in the crust and it causes an earthquake. And others originate in the liquid outer portion of the mantle. If something happens inside the Earth's core and we're floating on top of it...

Is it really that unreasonable to suggest that it wouldn't cause cataclysm on the surface, whether it be through earthquakes, continental crust displacement, which let me just say mainstream science totally disagrees on this. This is total pseudoscience. They do not agree with what I'm saying at all. Let me be clear. But it's still possible. And as well as – What am I looking for?

Is it really that unreasonable to suggest that it wouldn't cause cataclysm on the surface, whether it be through earthquakes, continental crust displacement, which let me just say mainstream science totally disagrees on this. This is total pseudoscience. They do not agree with what I'm saying at all. Let me be clear. But it's still possible. And as well as – What am I looking for?