Jimmy Corsetti

Let me just be clear. This is not a matter of funding. The Doge's group had poured in $15 million in the get-go to install – so this is where the real controversy comes in – is that they had built all the infrastructure for tourism out there, the roads, the sidewalks, the viewing platforms, and the roofing structure. And it was in the name of tourism and conservation. And –

Unfortunately, that caused a lot of destruction to the ruins in the process. The wife of the late Klaus Schmidt, who was the initial excavator of the site, was an archaeologist herself. And then when she was invited out there in 2018 following the construction of these platforms…

Unfortunately, that caused a lot of destruction to the ruins in the process. The wife of the late Klaus Schmidt, who was the initial excavator of the site, was an archaeologist herself. And then when she was invited out there in 2018 following the construction of these platforms…

Unfortunately, that caused a lot of destruction to the ruins in the process. The wife of the late Klaus Schmidt, who was the initial excavator of the site, was an archaeologist herself. And then when she was invited out there in 2018 following the construction of these platforms…

She went public and documented that they had poured concrete on ruins, that some of these roads were put on top of ruins. She said there was destruction to ancient ruins out there, and she got a ton of flack for it. This is an archaeologist sharing what she witnessed. She had worked the site with Klaus Schmidt. And so I suggest that like two things. One, it's incompetence and mismanagement.

She went public and documented that they had poured concrete on ruins, that some of these roads were put on top of ruins. She said there was destruction to ancient ruins out there, and she got a ton of flack for it. This is an archaeologist sharing what she witnessed. She had worked the site with Klaus Schmidt. And so I suggest that like two things. One, it's incompetence and mismanagement.

She went public and documented that they had poured concrete on ruins, that some of these roads were put on top of ruins. She said there was destruction to ancient ruins out there, and she got a ton of flack for it. This is an archaeologist sharing what she witnessed. She had worked the site with Klaus Schmidt. And so I suggest that like two things. One, it's incompetence and mismanagement.

They blew it. They fucked up when they built these things. Yeah. but on top of it, the fact that this stuff is on top of ruins signifies what I've been saying, which is that it's preventing a full excavation of the site in the first place. Um, it's an issue and you know, it's like they fucked up and same thing with the trees. Okay.

They blew it. They fucked up when they built these things. Yeah. but on top of it, the fact that this stuff is on top of ruins signifies what I've been saying, which is that it's preventing a full excavation of the site in the first place. Um, it's an issue and you know, it's like they fucked up and same thing with the trees. Okay.

They blew it. They fucked up when they built these things. Yeah. but on top of it, the fact that this stuff is on top of ruins signifies what I've been saying, which is that it's preventing a full excavation of the site in the first place. Um, it's an issue and you know, it's like they fucked up and same thing with the trees. Okay.

It wasn't nefarious because this is where the conspiracy is, is like, They planted a species of tree that is illegal to cut down. And by having the trees there, you can't fully excavate it. That's conspiracy. Or maybe it's just money. And the people, the farmers that sold it are just trying to make a buck. And they all fucked up in the process by allowing the trees to be planted where they were.

It wasn't nefarious because this is where the conspiracy is, is like, They planted a species of tree that is illegal to cut down. And by having the trees there, you can't fully excavate it. That's conspiracy. Or maybe it's just money. And the people, the farmers that sold it are just trying to make a buck. And they all fucked up in the process by allowing the trees to be planted where they were.

It wasn't nefarious because this is where the conspiracy is, is like, They planted a species of tree that is illegal to cut down. And by having the trees there, you can't fully excavate it. That's conspiracy. Or maybe it's just money. And the people, the farmers that sold it are just trying to make a buck. And they all fucked up in the process by allowing the trees to be planted where they were.

Whatever it is. there are unanswered questions about our past under the ground at Quebec, the Tepe. And I think it is entirely inexcusable to not dig up those pillars, especially with, you know, a study that it could be a lunar solar calendar. Like this is important. This is showing that humans were more advanced than what they were supposed to have been 11,600 years ago.

Whatever it is. there are unanswered questions about our past under the ground at Quebec, the Tepe. And I think it is entirely inexcusable to not dig up those pillars, especially with, you know, a study that it could be a lunar solar calendar. Like this is important. This is showing that humans were more advanced than what they were supposed to have been 11,600 years ago.

Whatever it is. there are unanswered questions about our past under the ground at Quebec, the Tepe. And I think it is entirely inexcusable to not dig up those pillars, especially with, you know, a study that it could be a lunar solar calendar. Like this is important. This is showing that humans were more advanced than what they were supposed to have been 11,600 years ago.

And, you know, so I look at these things and I'm like, that even ties into the Flint double Graham Hancock debate. And I'm like, you know, you know, they're arguing about different things. I'm like, hey, we need to focus on the fact that, like, there are answers waiting to be dug up and they won't even agree with us there.

And, you know, so I look at these things and I'm like, that even ties into the Flint double Graham Hancock debate. And I'm like, you know, you know, they're arguing about different things. I'm like, hey, we need to focus on the fact that, like, there are answers waiting to be dug up and they won't even agree with us there.

And, you know, so I look at these things and I'm like, that even ties into the Flint double Graham Hancock debate. And I'm like, you know, you know, they're arguing about different things. I'm like, hey, we need to focus on the fact that, like, there are answers waiting to be dug up and they won't even agree with us there.

Yeah. And let me say something else, if I may. One of the other pushback that he gave to not fully dig it up is like they said, and this is according to Dr. LeClair, the head of field work there, said that, well, we're going to wait for technological developments to advance before we further the dig. And I'm like.