Jimmy Corsetti

And the...

This exceeds the known capabilities of what the Romans had.

And it's worth mentioning that this site is some 2,400 miles from Rome, the capital.

And if they're going to say that this was created by the Romans, one, people need to understand that the Romans were renowned for documenting everything.

Yet this site is not credited to anybody.

They don't know exactly who did it or when.

But the academics conclude that it had to have been the Romans or the Phoenicians because, of course, there was no one before them.

And with this photo right here, let me say something else.

There is evidence of at least two but arguably three different architectures that were done at this site.

And I would conclude that this is evidence that this site existed in prehistoric times.

There's also – I can show you encyclopedias that talk about Baalbek being prehistoric in nature dating back 11,000 years of human history.

And what I argue is that it was built up.

It was found by the Romans and the Phoenicians and built upon later.

And right here is evidence for all that have eyes to see.

Look how they obviously use broken stones and constructed on top of it.

Why would you go for making the most advanced stones in history that far exceed anything you see in Rome?

For example, if you were to go to the Colosseum.

As magnificent as that is, it is an architecture of mathematics and just brilliance.

But this right here, why would they use the why would they for all the feats of Roman history?

Why would they have the most impressive feats over 2000 miles away from the capital?