Jimmy Corsetti

This one at the museum?

170 miles, and the other one was moved 106 miles.

And it's two million pounds.

And so this is where things get really fun, is that they say the academics, they say that the stones would have been moved on tree logs because that's their best guess.

And it's not an unreasonable guess.

But when you look into the nuanced details, so I really nerded out hard on this.

There's a lot of people.

Are you familiar with the Mohs scale of hardness?

So it's the measurement of stone, and it's often used by alternative ancient history buffs to say that, hey, copper-based tooling could not have been utilized to cut granite stone that's been claimed.

And there's no evidence that the Egyptians – the Egyptians never told us they used bronze tooling to cut the stones and make up the granite stones within the pyramid.

And so I started asking him, like, wait a second, if they're going to say that they moved a two point two million pound stone on tree logs.

Well, they say that it was the cedar, the the Lebanon cedar trees.

Well, I nerded out on this and there's something called the Janka scale of hardness, which measures the hardness of wood.

And it's often used for if you're going to pick wood flooring in your house, very soft wood.

It's one of the softest on earth, not the softest, but it's so soft that it would never even be considered for flooring in your house because your furniture and your heels would dent it immediately.

And if you were to put significant weight on it, whatever that weight is, it would either crush it, crumble it, or at least dent it out of a circle or being a circular nature to roll on.

And so when you look into the nuanced details involving the mysterious accomplishments of the ancients, it becomes abundantly clear.

Like if I had one thesis and

is that the true history of mankind was more advanced than what we were taught in school.

Now, how advanced?