Joe Liemandt

The model is the issue, but teachers are awesome.

I want to be really clear.

We should talk about how important the adults

in a building are.

But back to the learning science, AI allows you to do precise instruction to the student.

And then second, measure the results.

And if you take the AI out, your effect is dominated by the classroom.

And you don't know, is the student motivated?

Are they even trying?

What's the prior knowledge of the student?

Did the teacher actually instruct it correctly?

The environmental variables dominate

in the last 40 years with learning science.

With ours, with an AI giving very precise instruction and being able to close loop measure it, that close loop is the magic to your point, which is we have a closed loop that no one else has.

Our team comes up with an idea and says, okay, theoretically, let's take Dean Schwartz chapter K and put it in and we generate lessons.

The students use them.

How well does this improve teaching?

They take a standardized test.

We measure how long, how much time they spent.

They take a standardized test.