John Ashbrook

Imperfect self-defense is where you get a jury instruction where the jury can basically say, we're not going to vote for murder. We're going to eliminate malice based on imperfect self-defense. And that is the idea that you felt that there was danger because of the syndrome that you were exposed to. In this case, back in the 90s, we had battered women's syndrome.

Imperfect self-defense is where you get a jury instruction where the jury can basically say, we're not going to vote for murder. We're going to eliminate malice based on imperfect self-defense. And that is the idea that you felt that there was danger because of the syndrome that you were exposed to. In this case, back in the 90s, we had battered women's syndrome.

And I've talked to you, Megan, about the fact that I tried murder cases in the 90s where I used the battered women's syndrome. Back then, it was not extended formally by the legislature to others besides intimate partners. It was formally in 2004, the legislature expanded it. So the second trial, which the evidence started eight days after the O.J.,

And I've talked to you, Megan, about the fact that I tried murder cases in the 90s where I used the battered women's syndrome. Back then, it was not extended formally by the legislature to others besides intimate partners. It was formally in 2004, the legislature expanded it. So the second trial, which the evidence started eight days after the O.J.,

And I've talked to you, Megan, about the fact that I tried murder cases in the 90s where I used the battered women's syndrome. Back then, it was not extended formally by the legislature to others besides intimate partners. It was formally in 2004, the legislature expanded it. So the second trial, which the evidence started eight days after the O.J.,

There were some dramatically different rulings, and those rulings are what affected the result by the jury. That's on the habeas. Then on the resentencing, you have, and he's talked about it, he being Mr. Hockman, that he has looked at thousands of pages of C-files. C-files are the correctional files. It's everything correct.

There were some dramatically different rulings, and those rulings are what affected the result by the jury. That's on the habeas. Then on the resentencing, you have, and he's talked about it, he being Mr. Hockman, that he has looked at thousands of pages of C-files. C-files are the correctional files. It's everything correct.

There were some dramatically different rulings, and those rulings are what affected the result by the jury. That's on the habeas. Then on the resentencing, you have, and he's talked about it, he being Mr. Hockman, that he has looked at thousands of pages of C-files. C-files are the correctional files. It's everything correct.

that these two gentlemen for the last 35 years, actually 30 because for the first number of years they were in the county jail, it's everything they've done in prison.

that these two gentlemen for the last 35 years, actually 30 because for the first number of years they were in the county jail, it's everything they've done in prison.

that these two gentlemen for the last 35 years, actually 30 because for the first number of years they were in the county jail, it's everything they've done in prison.

And I will tell you that based on my investigation, based on the DAs who were involved in the investigation, who filed the resentencing memorandum, it's the most impressive book of accomplishments by anybody who, especially it's amplified when you think about the fact that That as of 2005, they had no hope of ever getting out. They could have gone in one direction.

And I will tell you that based on my investigation, based on the DAs who were involved in the investigation, who filed the resentencing memorandum, it's the most impressive book of accomplishments by anybody who, especially it's amplified when you think about the fact that That as of 2005, they had no hope of ever getting out. They could have gone in one direction.

And I will tell you that based on my investigation, based on the DAs who were involved in the investigation, who filed the resentencing memorandum, it's the most impressive book of accomplishments by anybody who, especially it's amplified when you think about the fact that That as of 2005, they had no hope of ever getting out. They could have gone in one direction.

Instead, they went in the direction of starting.

Instead, they went in the direction of starting.

Instead, they went in the direction of starting.

Well, I really do like my chances because, mind you, this is somebody who has practiced criminal defense. He represented, I believe, Lee Baca, who was the sheriff here who was charged federally. So once I point out to him,

Well, I really do like my chances because, mind you, this is somebody who has practiced criminal defense. He represented, I believe, Lee Baca, who was the sheriff here who was charged federally. So once I point out to him,

Well, I really do like my chances because, mind you, this is somebody who has practiced criminal defense. He represented, I believe, Lee Baca, who was the sheriff here who was charged federally. So once I point out to him,