John Ashbrook
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
What are you having me on here for? Just to look pretty? You have a handsome bald guy on here? I tried a case in Queens, New York, of a young woman who had her father's penis, and he was screaming and yelling, so she stuffed a towel in his mouth, and he gagged to death. It wasn't the penis injury that killed him. It was the gagging that killed him.
What are you having me on here for? Just to look pretty? You have a handsome bald guy on here? I tried a case in Queens, New York, of a young woman who had her father's penis, and he was screaming and yelling, so she stuffed a towel in his mouth, and he gagged to death. It wasn't the penis injury that killed him. It was the gagging that killed him.
Viewer warning, please. There you go. Well, I used a proper word. Like you sometimes there, Miss Kelly, who drops some bombs. My mother yelled at me. You're talking about- Talking like that. Castration. None is listening. So, anyway, the jury came back, and it was a woman. She testified. She admitted to every crime. Prosecutor, after her testimony, stood up in front of her and said, Ms.
Viewer warning, please. There you go. Well, I used a proper word. Like you sometimes there, Miss Kelly, who drops some bombs. My mother yelled at me. You're talking about- Talking like that. Castration. None is listening. So, anyway, the jury came back, and it was a woman. She testified. She admitted to every crime. Prosecutor, after her testimony, stood up in front of her and said, Ms.
Viewer warning, please. There you go. Well, I used a proper word. Like you sometimes there, Miss Kelly, who drops some bombs. My mother yelled at me. You're talking about- Talking like that. Castration. None is listening. So, anyway, the jury came back, and it was a woman. She testified. She admitted to every crime. Prosecutor, after her testimony, stood up in front of her and said, Ms.
Richard Harris, you intended to cause serious physical injury to your father by cutting off his penis, correct? Yes. And when you did that, you caused his death, correct? Thank you. Those are all the elements of manslaughter to the first degree, which is a 25-year sentence. The jury came back and said, not guilty. They found her guilty of a much lower charge.
Richard Harris, you intended to cause serious physical injury to your father by cutting off his penis, correct? Yes. And when you did that, you caused his death, correct? Thank you. Those are all the elements of manslaughter to the first degree, which is a 25-year sentence. The jury came back and said, not guilty. They found her guilty of a much lower charge.
Richard Harris, you intended to cause serious physical injury to your father by cutting off his penis, correct? Yes. And when you did that, you caused his death, correct? Thank you. Those are all the elements of manslaughter to the first degree, which is a 25-year sentence. The jury came back and said, not guilty. They found her guilty of a much lower charge.
in prison and she was out so you know it's somewhat similar he had not molested her in a decade but she saw him making moves on her five-year-old niece and she said i was not going to let that happen to my niece and i took matters literally into my own hands
in prison and she was out so you know it's somewhat similar he had not molested her in a decade but she saw him making moves on her five-year-old niece and she said i was not going to let that happen to my niece and i took matters literally into my own hands
in prison and she was out so you know it's somewhat similar he had not molested her in a decade but she saw him making moves on her five-year-old niece and she said i was not going to let that happen to my niece and i took matters literally into my own hands
No, I said it publicly after the last status conference. There is a case, an appellate case in California. It says specifically a subsequent DA cannot pull back the resentencing, number one. And number two, Judge Jessick also at the last hearing invoked what is called AB 600, which is his judge-initiated ability to do it. So no, he can't call it back.
No, I said it publicly after the last status conference. There is a case, an appellate case in California. It says specifically a subsequent DA cannot pull back the resentencing, number one. And number two, Judge Jessick also at the last hearing invoked what is called AB 600, which is his judge-initiated ability to do it. So no, he can't call it back.
No, I said it publicly after the last status conference. There is a case, an appellate case in California. It says specifically a subsequent DA cannot pull back the resentencing, number one. And number two, Judge Jessick also at the last hearing invoked what is called AB 600, which is his judge-initiated ability to do it. So no, he can't call it back.
Resentencing hearing is going to happen on the 30th and 31st, and it's going to be up to the judge.
Resentencing hearing is going to happen on the 30th and 31st, and it's going to be up to the judge.
Resentencing hearing is going to happen on the 30th and 31st, and it's going to be up to the judge.
Well, when you say inconsistencies, that's about as charitable as you can get. And by the way, I'm going to ask Alex Spiro next time he calls him a Busby, the 1-800 lawyer. I call him the 1-800 Diddy lawyer. I mean, he's out there with the billboards. He's filing things anonymously.
Well, when you say inconsistencies, that's about as charitable as you can get. And by the way, I'm going to ask Alex Spiro next time he calls him a Busby, the 1-800 lawyer. I call him the 1-800 Diddy lawyer. I mean, he's out there with the billboards. He's filing things anonymously.
Well, when you say inconsistencies, that's about as charitable as you can get. And by the way, I'm going to ask Alex Spiro next time he calls him a Busby, the 1-800 lawyer. I call him the 1-800 Diddy lawyer. I mean, he's out there with the billboards. He's filing things anonymously.