John Bickley

Syria, it's complicated. I was actually very interested in your perspective on that. I do think, again, this idea of de-escalation in general, sort of writ large, is his goal. He's accomplishing that, at least in terms of bringing the temperature down for now, where these details end up. We'll see if the deal actually is hammered out and how good it looks in the final stages.

President Trump reveals the U.S.

President Trump reveals the U.S.

I'm Daily Wire executive editor John Bickley with Georgia Howe. It's Friday, May 16th, and this is Morning Wire.

I'm Daily Wire executive editor John Bickley with Georgia Howe. It's Friday, May 16th, and this is Morning Wire.

And Trump drafts coaching legend Nick Saban to bring some order to big-dollar college athletics.

And Trump drafts coaching legend Nick Saban to bring some order to big-dollar college athletics.

After months of tense negotiations, President Trump says Iran is on the verge of signing a historic nuclear deal.

After months of tense negotiations, President Trump says Iran is on the verge of signing a historic nuclear deal.

Joining us to break down the case is Daily Wire White House correspondent Mary Margaret Olihan. Hey, Mary Margaret. So tell us about the president's efforts to end birthright citizenship.

Joining us to break down the case is Daily Wire White House correspondent Mary Margaret Olihan. Hey, Mary Margaret. So tell us about the president's efforts to end birthright citizenship.

Since January 20th, district courts have now issued 40 universal injunctions against the federal government, including 35 from the same five judicial districts. This is a bipartisan problem that has now spanned the last five presidential administrations. Universal injunctions exceed the judicial power granted in Article III, which exists only to address the injury to the complaining party.

Since January 20th, district courts have now issued 40 universal injunctions against the federal government, including 35 from the same five judicial districts. This is a bipartisan problem that has now spanned the last five presidential administrations. Universal injunctions exceed the judicial power granted in Article III, which exists only to address the injury to the complaining party.

So let's start with the left side of the court. Where do the liberal justices stand on this issue?

So let's start with the left side of the court. Where do the liberal justices stand on this issue?

It was about giving citizenship to the children of slaves, not to the children of illegal immigrants who really were not even a very discreet class at that time. And there were some people in Congress who argued against the 13th Amendment just because of that.

It was about giving citizenship to the children of slaves, not to the children of illegal immigrants who really were not even a very discreet class at that time. And there were some people in Congress who argued against the 13th Amendment just because of that.

We are not claiming that because we're conceding that there could be an inappropriate case. Only a class, only one class. Can I hear the rest of his answer?

We are not claiming that because we're conceding that there could be an inappropriate case. Only a class, only one class. Can I hear the rest of his answer?

All right, now what about the conservative justices? Do they seem open to the administration's arguments?