John J. Boziak

And it kind of sunk in because my father was on a board of directors for 35 years of a credit union in Illinois. And they met the first week of every month for a board of directors meeting. It's called the Open Meetings Act. And I said, I'm wondering if this person is on a board of directors. And then I took his email. I should have done this 10 months ago. I just didn't.

You know, you're in the moment. You're not thinking clearly. You know, I have ADD. I can be a ding-a-ling too and not think clear. I'm like, wait a minute. Why don't I try and back, you know, try and find out what this email connects to. And I have a program through the automobile industry, believe it or not, that does that. And I found out that the email connected to an institution.

You know, you're in the moment. You're not thinking clearly. You know, I have ADD. I can be a ding-a-ling too and not think clear. I'm like, wait a minute. Why don't I try and back, you know, try and find out what this email connects to. And I have a program through the automobile industry, believe it or not, that does that. And I found out that the email connected to an institution.

You know, you're in the moment. You're not thinking clearly. You know, I have ADD. I can be a ding-a-ling too and not think clear. I'm like, wait a minute. Why don't I try and back, you know, try and find out what this email connects to. And I have a program through the automobile industry, believe it or not, that does that. And I found out that the email connected to an institution.

I'm going to leave it at that. in a metropolitan city. And through my research, I called the number. It was this man's daughter's office that the email was coming from. And my speculation based on a lot of anecdotal evidence is that when this man would come for a board of directors meeting once a month, he would go into his daughter's office and use her computer and email me.

I'm going to leave it at that. in a metropolitan city. And through my research, I called the number. It was this man's daughter's office that the email was coming from. And my speculation based on a lot of anecdotal evidence is that when this man would come for a board of directors meeting once a month, he would go into his daughter's office and use her computer and email me.

I'm going to leave it at that. in a metropolitan city. And through my research, I called the number. It was this man's daughter's office that the email was coming from. And my speculation based on a lot of anecdotal evidence is that when this man would come for a board of directors meeting once a month, he would go into his daughter's office and use her computer and email me.

And I was pretty proud that I, you know, I did the Colombo investigation and kind of realized that. And I actually spoke to her, but of course I was, you know, I lied to her. I was, you know, didn't tell her exactly why I was calling. You know, I got her name. It's not the name

And I was pretty proud that I, you know, I did the Colombo investigation and kind of realized that. And I actually spoke to her, but of course I was, you know, I lied to her. I was, you know, didn't tell her exactly why I was calling. You know, I got her name. It's not the name

And I was pretty proud that I, you know, I did the Colombo investigation and kind of realized that. And I actually spoke to her, but of course I was, you know, I lied to her. I was, you know, didn't tell her exactly why I was calling. You know, I got her name. It's not the name

And that's why I call my main whistleblower the chairman, because he was on a board of directors in an institution in a metropolitan city. And, you know, so I had all this provenance. And I said, well, what else can I do? Now, there was a man in Europe who... dissected the video piece by piece, and he found microscopic eyebrow movements.

And that's why I call my main whistleblower the chairman, because he was on a board of directors in an institution in a metropolitan city. And, you know, so I had all this provenance. And I said, well, what else can I do? Now, there was a man in Europe who... dissected the video piece by piece, and he found microscopic eyebrow movements.

And that's why I call my main whistleblower the chairman, because he was on a board of directors in an institution in a metropolitan city. And, you know, so I had all this provenance. And I said, well, what else can I do? Now, there was a man in Europe who... dissected the video piece by piece, and he found microscopic eyebrow movements.

He found the mouth opening and closing, and so did journalist Jaime Muson in Mexico, who emailed me, John, close up on the mouth. You know, you're going to fall off your chair. It opens and closes instantaneously, and it doesn't have any protruding animatronic metals or whatnot.

He found the mouth opening and closing, and so did journalist Jaime Muson in Mexico, who emailed me, John, close up on the mouth. You know, you're going to fall off your chair. It opens and closes instantaneously, and it doesn't have any protruding animatronic metals or whatnot.

He found the mouth opening and closing, and so did journalist Jaime Muson in Mexico, who emailed me, John, close up on the mouth. You know, you're going to fall off your chair. It opens and closes instantaneously, and it doesn't have any protruding animatronic metals or whatnot.

So trying to know that I'm going to get vetted, I'm going to be asked, my investigation is going to be microscopically analyzed. I then paid $2,500 and my wife was not happy to an animatronic expert in California who was hired by National Geographic to do a deep dive microscopic analysis of the Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot film. I mean, what better guy to take this to, right?

So trying to know that I'm going to get vetted, I'm going to be asked, my investigation is going to be microscopically analyzed. I then paid $2,500 and my wife was not happy to an animatronic expert in California who was hired by National Geographic to do a deep dive microscopic analysis of the Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot film. I mean, what better guy to take this to, right?

So trying to know that I'm going to get vetted, I'm going to be asked, my investigation is going to be microscopically analyzed. I then paid $2,500 and my wife was not happy to an animatronic expert in California who was hired by National Geographic to do a deep dive microscopic analysis of the Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot film. I mean, what better guy to take this to, right?

If National Geographic trusts him. So I spent $2,500. I gave him the film. He immediately three days later writes, sends me back a picture of the monitor and the monitor because an FX person told us, well, it's a pane of glass. They're bouncing a laser on it. Somebody off camera. He said, it's not a pane of glass. It's a device. It's a box. It's surrounded by metal. It's an actual monitor.