John Mearsheimer

But my argument is that structure was the principal factor driving the train in Hitler's case.

But-

What I'm saying here is that there were other factors as well.

Resentment being one of them, will to power, or the fact that he was a congenital aggressor in my lexicon certainly mattered as well.

So I don't want to dismiss your point about resentment.

I think that as a result of defeat in World War I and all the trials and tribulations associated with Weimar Germany, and then the coming of the Great Depression, all of those factors definitely account for his coming to power.

I think that one of the reasons that he was so successful at winning over the German people once he came to power was because there was a great deal of resentment in the German body politic.

And he played on that resentment.

That surely helped him get elected too.

But I think, having studied the case, it was even more important once he took over.

I also believe that one of the principal reasons that he was so popular, and he was wildly popular inside Nazi Germany, is because he was the only leader of an industrialized country who pulled his country out of the Depression.

And that really mattered.

And it made him very effective.

It's also worth noting that he was a remarkably charismatic individual.

I find that hard to believe because every time I look at him or listen to his speeches, he does not appear to be charismatic to me.

But I've talked to a number of people who are experts on this subject who assure me that he was very charismatic.

And I would note to you, if you look at public opinion polls in Germany, West Germany, in the late 1940s, this is the late 1940s, after the Third Reich is destroyed in 1945, he is still remarkably popular in the polls.

Stalin is still popular in many parts of Eastern Europe.

Yeah, yeah.

And Stalin's popular in many quarters inside Russia.