John Siracusa

It's not the best in the world, but it's pretty, pretty good.

Those are big numbers, by the way, because first of all, no one, you do not want to, well, maybe Marco does, but most people don't want to blind themselves, would want to put it at 1,000 nits SDR.

That means like your window, white windows would be 1,000 nits.

That's, unless it's a really sunny room, that's very bright.

And 2,000 nits peak is higher than the XDR because the XDR was 1,600 nits peak.

So good specs.

This is a better monitor than the Studio Display, as the name would imply.

It is a better monitor than...

Specs-wise, than the Protos by XDR, it's just not as big.

But that's nice.

So you don't have to like switch modes.

I mean, I guess that's just standard, but they called it out specifically.

So I'm assuming that's a default mode and you get Adobe RGB and P3.

If you look at the little triangles on the color area, they're not quite the same, but they're similar.

Yeah, I mean, it's a high-end monitor.

It has good color support.

It's well calibrated, and they're just trying to get a certification that allows it to be used in this particular way, because who else is going to buy this monitor at the prices that we're about to see?

That's not new.

That's the old studio display has that as well.

The only difference in the speaker setups is 30% deeper bass.