John Solomon

And then he he's unclear.

He's unclear as to whether or not he remembers if Comey specifically authorized it or he just did it because he knew that's what Comey wanted.

But remember, there's some evidence we don't know about.

As I mentioned earlier, I'm told that there are some text messages and emails that will be dispositive as this case goes forward.

So I think we have to wait and see what it is.

I think I'd like to go back.

Megan, if you could do it.

When Ted Cruz goes back the second time and reaffirms what he just heard from Comey, he broadens the claim.

And I think that's something I just want to hear again.

Maybe we all should hear.

Yeah, let's play it again.

He doesn't narrow it to Clinton and Trump anymore.

He says, I just want to make sure you're saying you never asked anyone to ever leak.

Let's see if we can play that because I think he broadens the claim there.

So that's the piece you're talking about.

Yeah, he drops out Clinton and Trump at that point.

Now, again, listen, I think we're splitting hairs when we're getting this, and I'm not sure a grand jury would have tolerated that level of splitting hairs.

But I did notice that in the follow-up question, and it's very interesting that the indictment makes no reference to 2017 testimony.

It's not trying to tie back to 2017.

So-