John Solomon

But the people at the bottom of the food chain, they didn't care.

And they didn't intervene.

Now, do they not care for political reasons?

Do they not care because they just weren't good at their job?

We don't know the answer to that.

But when those people start getting indicted because they didn't, they weren't good stewards of the money, you're going to see the system tighten up pretty quickly.

And I think that's the next wave of indictments.

All right.

We got the fraudsters and the con men.

At least in Minnesota.

Now the question is, who downstream is getting investigated?

We've seen criminal referrals from James Comer, looking at some of the people in the state government.

We've got whistleblowers that have dates and times and names of when people were told and didn't act.

When state officials start getting in county and city officials start getting indicted for not protecting the federal funds that they were entrusted with, that's when the system is going to tighten up really quick because that's where all the abuse occurs downstream from Uncle Sam.

Well, it is as rooted in a corruption of the intelligence community as anything we've seen.

Russia collusion, that mom's intelligence report, which we broke three weeks ago when Director Ratcliffe retracted it because it was so offensive and so laughable.

But what has happened is that the left has infiltrated an intelligence community that traditionally has been centrist, even a little conservative in its views over the history of this country, infected it with a leftist ideology, and then tried to impose that politics over an intelligence officer's obligation to put the country first.

In Great Britain, when they learned China was hacked, or when China had hacked their voter registration database, the intelligence community there put their country first.

They made it public.

They corrected it.