John
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
She was resolute.
So how would proscribing the IRGC change anything?
I'm just trying to understand, like when you talked about community cohesion, if there's an actual terrorist group that is trying to weave terror in this particular community, what does that change how you fight it?
On exactly that point, Sarah, when Keir Starmer was visiting a synagogue last week, he called out Zach Polanski, the Green leader, as disgraceful for saying it was important to distinguish between the actual threat to the Jewish community and the perception of unsafety.
Do you agree with Keir Starmer?
Do you think that is disgraceful?
Or do you think that Zach Polanski has allowed what he calls nuance in this debate?
What do you feel?
Sarah Seckman, thank you.
Thanks for joining us.
Thank you very much.
From a range of trusted voices and award-winning journalists.
Listen on our free Global Player app or the LBC app.
So we now understand a little better why the King will have been so apprehensive, I guess, about how his speech to Congress would be received and would go down, because the truth is, he did not hold back.
It was far more
political than I think certainly many in the room were expecting and certainly many of us at home were expecting.
And as we said on Monday, there was an element of speak over the head of the principal here, Donald Trump, and tell the people in the room and at home what your real message is.
And so he went to places that were
quite frankly, in the lion's den.
He talked about NATO and he talked specifically about Article 5, which was invoked by European nations after 9-11 to help America.