Jon Lovett

It's a bad policy.

But presumably the Supreme Court doesn't believe federal law should be made to assuage false concerns.

They're trying to interpret what the law says.

Are they suggesting that we've that the elections we've been running have all been a foul of federal election law?

Or are they just ignoring this all together?

I am a summer child.

I'm going to spring out in LA here.

Yeah, it's nice.

Right.

Well, because if the state has an interest in making their elections fair, the state would be the one trying to protect their electoral interest.

Perhaps one way they're trying to make sure the elections are fair is by counting.

You know, then that would be there.

That would be right.

This is this is about usurping the state's prerogative to vote.

Oversee the elections.

But but you basically what you saw today leads you to think that this is right now on the edge.

But there could be five votes to protect the counting of absentee ballots.

And the fact that it's close is incredibly terrifying.

Basically.

Speaking of straight up voter suppression, the president's on a tear here.