Jonathan Leach
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Those are the people that I think I want to strike as the plaintiff attorney because I'm looking for the opposite.
Those are the people that I think I want to strike as the plaintiff attorney because I'm looking for the opposite.
And that initial shelter hearing, which is in October of 2016, what I show here is that the guardian ad litem actually says, you know, we're in a tough spot here. I think he says all of us agree that she needs to be transferred to the appropriate place. We just don't know where that is. We're having a hard time figuring out where that could be. So, yeah, what comes through is this kind of –
And that initial shelter hearing, which is in October of 2016, what I show here is that the guardian ad litem actually says, you know, we're in a tough spot here. I think he says all of us agree that she needs to be transferred to the appropriate place. We just don't know where that is. We're having a hard time figuring out where that could be. So, yeah, what comes through is this kind of –
And that initial shelter hearing, which is in October of 2016, what I show here is that the guardian ad litem actually says, you know, we're in a tough spot here. I think he says all of us agree that she needs to be transferred to the appropriate place. We just don't know where that is. We're having a hard time figuring out where that could be. So, yeah, what comes through is this kind of –
desperation on all parties. Let's figure out what the best plan is and let's do that. Now, with respect to the specific plan to transport her to Nemours, my understanding is, I think I saw testimony on this, that there was, at least from the hospital's viewpoint, a meeting of the minds, right? We all agreed this is what should happen.
desperation on all parties. Let's figure out what the best plan is and let's do that. Now, with respect to the specific plan to transport her to Nemours, my understanding is, I think I saw testimony on this, that there was, at least from the hospital's viewpoint, a meeting of the minds, right? We all agreed this is what should happen.
desperation on all parties. Let's figure out what the best plan is and let's do that. Now, with respect to the specific plan to transport her to Nemours, my understanding is, I think I saw testimony on this, that there was, at least from the hospital's viewpoint, a meeting of the minds, right? We all agreed this is what should happen.
And then the very next day, the hospital discovers that no, the Kowalskis aren't part of that plan after all. We thought we had a plan yesterday and then today it's no, we're not taking her there.
And then the very next day, the hospital discovers that no, the Kowalskis aren't part of that plan after all. We thought we had a plan yesterday and then today it's no, we're not taking her there.
And then the very next day, the hospital discovers that no, the Kowalskis aren't part of that plan after all. We thought we had a plan yesterday and then today it's no, we're not taking her there.
I think if I'm the plaintiff's attorney, I'm feeling maybe more confident about the negligence claim. That is the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim.
I think if I'm the plaintiff's attorney, I'm feeling maybe more confident about the negligence claim. That is the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim.
I think if I'm the plaintiff's attorney, I'm feeling maybe more confident about the negligence claim. That is the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim.
than maybe the malpractice claim, just because I think when the jury sits down with the verdict form, they will not have a difficult path to navigate there from things that the hospital would have, could have, should have done in order to prevent all this. I think what we're seeing so far, at least, is a little bit of fuzziness about what exactly is the protocol.
than maybe the malpractice claim, just because I think when the jury sits down with the verdict form, they will not have a difficult path to navigate there from things that the hospital would have, could have, should have done in order to prevent all this. I think what we're seeing so far, at least, is a little bit of fuzziness about what exactly is the protocol.
than maybe the malpractice claim, just because I think when the jury sits down with the verdict form, they will not have a difficult path to navigate there from things that the hospital would have, could have, should have done in order to prevent all this. I think what we're seeing so far, at least, is a little bit of fuzziness about what exactly is the protocol.
What is the standard operating procedure? You and I can explain maybe why the 85 days elapsed or the 87 days elapsed, but it proves to me that the hospital was assertively, aggressively trying to find a plan B for this little girl. I'm thinking that NIED claim looks pretty promising maybe for the plaintiff.
What is the standard operating procedure? You and I can explain maybe why the 85 days elapsed or the 87 days elapsed, but it proves to me that the hospital was assertively, aggressively trying to find a plan B for this little girl. I'm thinking that NIED claim looks pretty promising maybe for the plaintiff.
What is the standard operating procedure? You and I can explain maybe why the 85 days elapsed or the 87 days elapsed, but it proves to me that the hospital was assertively, aggressively trying to find a plan B for this little girl. I'm thinking that NIED claim looks pretty promising maybe for the plaintiff.