Jonathan Leach

Her treatment at Tampa General, which is basically the month of July and August in 2015, as I understand it, she is prescribed drugs. physical therapy and psychological counseling coming out of Tampa General.

Her treatment at Tampa General, which is basically the month of July and August in 2015, as I understand it, she is prescribed drugs. physical therapy and psychological counseling coming out of Tampa General.

As far as I can tell, the really next significant event after that visit to Tampa General, that month there of therapy is that Beata takes her to Dr. Kirkpatrick for what begins this ketamine infusion treatment. I mean, it just, in terms of a visual, that just seems to be a significant turn that would be important for the jury to know about.

As far as I can tell, the really next significant event after that visit to Tampa General, that month there of therapy is that Beata takes her to Dr. Kirkpatrick for what begins this ketamine infusion treatment. I mean, it just, in terms of a visual, that just seems to be a significant turn that would be important for the jury to know about.

As far as I can tell, the really next significant event after that visit to Tampa General, that month there of therapy is that Beata takes her to Dr. Kirkpatrick for what begins this ketamine infusion treatment. I mean, it just, in terms of a visual, that just seems to be a significant turn that would be important for the jury to know about.

In essence, it says that the specialized knowledge that the expert has is

In essence, it says that the specialized knowledge that the expert has is

In essence, it says that the specialized knowledge that the expert has is

is admissible if it is based on reliable principles and methods that are generally accepted in the community of experts, typically the scientific community, and that it's based upon facts and data, and that in the judge's opinion, the expert has reasonably, rationally applied their principles and methods to the facts and the data.

is admissible if it is based on reliable principles and methods that are generally accepted in the community of experts, typically the scientific community, and that it's based upon facts and data, and that in the judge's opinion, the expert has reasonably, rationally applied their principles and methods to the facts and the data.

is admissible if it is based on reliable principles and methods that are generally accepted in the community of experts, typically the scientific community, and that it's based upon facts and data, and that in the judge's opinion, the expert has reasonably, rationally applied their principles and methods to the facts and the data.

And what the plaintiffs in this case are asserting is that because these terms, Munchausen's and falsification, medical child abuse, are so fuzzy in their opinion, and the science, they characterize it in their motion as junk science, that Judge Carroll should not allow any of this testimony in.

And what the plaintiffs in this case are asserting is that because these terms, Munchausen's and falsification, medical child abuse, are so fuzzy in their opinion, and the science, they characterize it in their motion as junk science, that Judge Carroll should not allow any of this testimony in.

And what the plaintiffs in this case are asserting is that because these terms, Munchausen's and falsification, medical child abuse, are so fuzzy in their opinion, and the science, they characterize it in their motion as junk science, that Judge Carroll should not allow any of this testimony in.