Jordan Berman

"...and then consistent with that purpose, the executive order revokes a previous executive order issued in 2000 by President Clinton called Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency." However, the new order also confirms that one, no changes will be mandated to the services provided by government agencies.

"...and then consistent with that purpose, the executive order revokes a previous executive order issued in 2000 by President Clinton called Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency." However, the new order also confirms that one, no changes will be mandated to the services provided by government agencies.

Two, agency heads have the authority to make decisions necessary to fulfill their missions and provide efficient government services. Three, agencies are not required to change, remove or discontinue documents, products or services in languages other than English.

Two, agency heads have the authority to make decisions necessary to fulfill their missions and provide efficient government services. Three, agencies are not required to change, remove or discontinue documents, products or services in languages other than English.

Two, agency heads have the authority to make decisions necessary to fulfill their missions and provide efficient government services. Three, agencies are not required to change, remove or discontinue documents, products or services in languages other than English.

And four, that the Attorney General must rescind any policy guidance issued under that 2000 executive order and provide updated guidance that complies with the new order. A new lawsuit has been filed against the Trump administration attempting to prevent the transfer of more migrants to Guantanamo. As we talked about, I think maybe last month,

And four, that the Attorney General must rescind any policy guidance issued under that 2000 executive order and provide updated guidance that complies with the new order. A new lawsuit has been filed against the Trump administration attempting to prevent the transfer of more migrants to Guantanamo. As we talked about, I think maybe last month,

And four, that the Attorney General must rescind any policy guidance issued under that 2000 executive order and provide updated guidance that complies with the new order. A new lawsuit has been filed against the Trump administration attempting to prevent the transfer of more migrants to Guantanamo. As we talked about, I think maybe last month,

There was a similar lawsuit that was filed, but that lawsuit argued that migrants couldn't be moved to Guantanamo because of their lack of access to attorneys and family while there. This new lawsuit argues that the actual act of sending the migrants to Guantanamo is unconstitutional and unlawful. And there are essentially three claims in this new lawsuit.

There was a similar lawsuit that was filed, but that lawsuit argued that migrants couldn't be moved to Guantanamo because of their lack of access to attorneys and family while there. This new lawsuit argues that the actual act of sending the migrants to Guantanamo is unconstitutional and unlawful. And there are essentially three claims in this new lawsuit.

There was a similar lawsuit that was filed, but that lawsuit argued that migrants couldn't be moved to Guantanamo because of their lack of access to attorneys and family while there. This new lawsuit argues that the actual act of sending the migrants to Guantanamo is unconstitutional and unlawful. And there are essentially three claims in this new lawsuit.

Number one, the transfers to Guantanamo violate the Immigration and Nationality Act. Two, the transfer rules set forth by the administration violates the Administrative Procedure Act. And three, transferring the migrants violates the Fifth Amendment, which affords defendants due process.

Number one, the transfers to Guantanamo violate the Immigration and Nationality Act. Two, the transfer rules set forth by the administration violates the Administrative Procedure Act. And three, transferring the migrants violates the Fifth Amendment, which affords defendants due process.

Number one, the transfers to Guantanamo violate the Immigration and Nationality Act. Two, the transfer rules set forth by the administration violates the Administrative Procedure Act. And three, transferring the migrants violates the Fifth Amendment, which affords defendants due process.

So for that first claim, the argument that transferring migrants to Cuba, which is where Guantanamo is, is essentially that... Cuba is not a proper removal destination under the Immigration and Nationality Act framework.

So for that first claim, the argument that transferring migrants to Cuba, which is where Guantanamo is, is essentially that... Cuba is not a proper removal destination under the Immigration and Nationality Act framework.

So for that first claim, the argument that transferring migrants to Cuba, which is where Guantanamo is, is essentially that... Cuba is not a proper removal destination under the Immigration and Nationality Act framework.

The second claim, which alleges a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, basically says that the administration has failed to put forth reasoned explanations for the decision to transfer migrants to Guantanamo, and in making its decision to do so, the administration considered factors that Congress did not intend to be considered."

The second claim, which alleges a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, basically says that the administration has failed to put forth reasoned explanations for the decision to transfer migrants to Guantanamo, and in making its decision to do so, the administration considered factors that Congress did not intend to be considered."

The second claim, which alleges a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act, basically says that the administration has failed to put forth reasoned explanations for the decision to transfer migrants to Guantanamo, and in making its decision to do so, the administration considered factors that Congress did not intend to be considered."