Jordan Berman

Vielen Dank. So, this minerals deal was proposed last year by Zelensky in an effort to incentivize the United States to continue to support Ukraine in its war with Russia. As for the United States, the United States likely would not benefit from this deal for at least a decade, probably closer to two decades, and that's just because mining is a long-term process.

First, you have to identify reserves, and then from there it takes about 18 years to develop a mine, plus about 500 Millionen bis zu einem Billion Dollar, um eine Mine zu bauen und den Unternehmensseparationsplan. Once all that is done, that is when the United States would start to see the mineral benefits.

First, you have to identify reserves, and then from there it takes about 18 years to develop a mine, plus about 500 Millionen bis zu einem Billion Dollar, um eine Mine zu bauen und den Unternehmensseparationsplan. Once all that is done, that is when the United States would start to see the mineral benefits.

First, you have to identify reserves, and then from there it takes about 18 years to develop a mine, plus about 500 Millionen bis zu einem Billion Dollar, um eine Mine zu bauen und den Unternehmensseparationsplan. Once all that is done, that is when the United States would start to see the mineral benefits.

Now, President Trump had initially requested 500 billion dollars in mineral wealth under the terms of the deal. His rationale was that the United States has given Ukraine between 300 and 350 billion dollars in aid and that the United States needs to get that money back plus some. However, Ukraine rejected that request with one Ukraine economist saying the deal term would bankrupt the country.

Now, President Trump had initially requested 500 billion dollars in mineral wealth under the terms of the deal. His rationale was that the United States has given Ukraine between 300 and 350 billion dollars in aid and that the United States needs to get that money back plus some. However, Ukraine rejected that request with one Ukraine economist saying the deal term would bankrupt the country.

Now, President Trump had initially requested 500 billion dollars in mineral wealth under the terms of the deal. His rationale was that the United States has given Ukraine between 300 and 350 billion dollars in aid and that the United States needs to get that money back plus some. However, Ukraine rejected that request with one Ukraine economist saying the deal term would bankrupt the country.

The United States has since dropped the demand. Notably, the deal did not include a security guarantee from the United States, which is something that Zelensky had pushed for and continues to push for. On whether he would walk away from the agreement without a security guarantee from the United States, Zelensky said he would not sign the deal until Trump decides to

The United States has since dropped the demand. Notably, the deal did not include a security guarantee from the United States, which is something that Zelensky had pushed for and continues to push for. On whether he would walk away from the agreement without a security guarantee from the United States, Zelensky said he would not sign the deal until Trump decides to

The United States has since dropped the demand. Notably, the deal did not include a security guarantee from the United States, which is something that Zelensky had pushed for and continues to push for. On whether he would walk away from the agreement without a security guarantee from the United States, Zelensky said he would not sign the deal until Trump decides to

how to tie the agreement to a U.S. security guarantee, saying, quote, if we don't get security guarantees, we won't have a ceasefire, nothing will work, nothing, end quote. As for Trump, though, he said the United States would not be providing security guarantees beyond very much.

how to tie the agreement to a U.S. security guarantee, saying, quote, if we don't get security guarantees, we won't have a ceasefire, nothing will work, nothing, end quote. As for Trump, though, he said the United States would not be providing security guarantees beyond very much.

how to tie the agreement to a U.S. security guarantee, saying, quote, if we don't get security guarantees, we won't have a ceasefire, nothing will work, nothing, end quote. As for Trump, though, he said the United States would not be providing security guarantees beyond very much.

While the published agreement says that the United States supports Ukraine's efforts to obtain security guarantees, Trump has said that the security responsibility is on Europe and claimed that the presence of US workers in Ukraine would provide automatic security. So going into this Friday meeting, there were already disagreements on the table, most notably over that security guarantee.

While the published agreement says that the United States supports Ukraine's efforts to obtain security guarantees, Trump has said that the security responsibility is on Europe and claimed that the presence of US workers in Ukraine would provide automatic security. So going into this Friday meeting, there were already disagreements on the table, most notably over that security guarantee.

While the published agreement says that the United States supports Ukraine's efforts to obtain security guarantees, Trump has said that the security responsibility is on Europe and claimed that the presence of US workers in Ukraine would provide automatic security. So going into this Friday meeting, there were already disagreements on the table, most notably over that security guarantee.

But what sparked the argument in the Oval Office was a question from a reporter about Polans history under Russian control. The reporter said that as a child, he viewed the United States as the most powerful country known for its great entertainment culture and being a force for good. But he said that his friends worry that Trump aligns too closely with Putin.

But what sparked the argument in the Oval Office was a question from a reporter about Polans history under Russian control. The reporter said that as a child, he viewed the United States as the most powerful country known for its great entertainment culture and being a force for good. But he said that his friends worry that Trump aligns too closely with Putin.

But what sparked the argument in the Oval Office was a question from a reporter about Polans history under Russian control. The reporter said that as a child, he viewed the United States as the most powerful country known for its great entertainment culture and being a force for good. But he said that his friends worry that Trump aligns too closely with Putin.

Und er will Trumps Botschaft für sie wissen. Trump antwortete dazu, dass er nicht mit Russland oder der Ukraine verabschiedet ist, sondern mit den Vereinigten Staaten und für das Gute der Welt. Er sagte, dass es wichtig ist, neutral zu bleiben als Mediator, um Verhandlungen zu machen, und dass es nicht hilft, Seiten zu wählen oder schlecht zu sprechen.