Jordan Peterson

There were departments like English that were infected, so to speak, with the postmodern bug, and that were radically liberal, but they were fringe, and now they're not. And then let's talk about the administration. There's no direct survey data on the political leadings of Harvard's administration. There's more administration than faculty, by the way. Conservative faculty members at Harvard

There were departments like English that were infected, so to speak, with the postmodern bug, and that were radically liberal, but they were fringe, and now they're not. And then let's talk about the administration. There's no direct survey data on the political leadings of Harvard's administration. There's more administration than faculty, by the way. Conservative faculty members at Harvard

Yeah, all two of them, such as Harvey C. Mansfield, have suggested that the administration is even less ideologically diverse than the faculty. A 2015

Yeah, all two of them, such as Harvey C. Mansfield, have suggested that the administration is even less ideologically diverse than the faculty. A 2015

Yeah, all two of them, such as Harvey C. Mansfield, have suggested that the administration is even less ideologically diverse than the faculty. A 2015

Harvard Crimson analysis, and so you can be sure it's much worse than this now, found that 96%, only 96%, of campaign contributions from faculty of arts and sciences, faculty and staff, which may include some administrative roles, went to democratic campaigns between 2011 and 2014. So, well... So there you go. Now we could talk about researchers, right?

Harvard Crimson analysis, and so you can be sure it's much worse than this now, found that 96%, only 96%, of campaign contributions from faculty of arts and sciences, faculty and staff, which may include some administrative roles, went to democratic campaigns between 2011 and 2014. So, well... So there you go. Now we could talk about researchers, right?

Harvard Crimson analysis, and so you can be sure it's much worse than this now, found that 96%, only 96%, of campaign contributions from faculty of arts and sciences, faculty and staff, which may include some administrative roles, went to democratic campaigns between 2011 and 2014. So, well... So there you go. Now we could talk about researchers, right?

Because those are the scientists, the people who are in the labs, busily pumping out these world-shaking novel discoveries that are then published in the entirely reliable scientific journals and distributed to interested scientists all around the world. Well, that's the theory, isn't it? And that was actually true. You know, for most of my academic career, I could be pretty much certain

Because those are the scientists, the people who are in the labs, busily pumping out these world-shaking novel discoveries that are then published in the entirely reliable scientific journals and distributed to interested scientists all around the world. Well, that's the theory, isn't it? And that was actually true. You know, for most of my academic career, I could be pretty much certain

Because those are the scientists, the people who are in the labs, busily pumping out these world-shaking novel discoveries that are then published in the entirely reliable scientific journals and distributed to interested scientists all around the world. Well, that's the theory, isn't it? And that was actually true. You know, for most of my academic career, I could be pretty much certain

that everything that was published in an academic journal 90% of everything that was published in an academic journal, maybe even more than that, was at least good faith. It wasn't true because you can't expect all scientific publications to be true. If 20% of them were true, that would be like something stellar and remarkable.

that everything that was published in an academic journal 90% of everything that was published in an academic journal, maybe even more than that, was at least good faith. It wasn't true because you can't expect all scientific publications to be true. If 20% of them were true, that would be like something stellar and remarkable.

that everything that was published in an academic journal 90% of everything that was published in an academic journal, maybe even more than that, was at least good faith. It wasn't true because you can't expect all scientific publications to be true. If 20% of them were true, that would be like something stellar and remarkable.

People are going to make mistakes, but you could assume reflexively that if a paper was published, particularly in a decent journal, that You had reason to trust the integrity of the researchers, even if not the truth of the report. And then you had to be a scientist and try to figure out for yourself what was credible and what wasn't credible. And you can't do better than that.

People are going to make mistakes, but you could assume reflexively that if a paper was published, particularly in a decent journal, that You had reason to trust the integrity of the researchers, even if not the truth of the report. And then you had to be a scientist and try to figure out for yourself what was credible and what wasn't credible. And you can't do better than that.

People are going to make mistakes, but you could assume reflexively that if a paper was published, particularly in a decent journal, that You had reason to trust the integrity of the researchers, even if not the truth of the report. And then you had to be a scientist and try to figure out for yourself what was credible and what wasn't credible. And you can't do better than that.

I started my graduate training in 1985, and I finished my academic career in 2016. That's 30 years. And for most of that, I was pretty... solid in my delight to be not only a professor, but also a researcher. It was trustworthy. And then that stopped, and we'll see. So now we have the researchers, and they're winding up quite the storm because Trump is threatening their research funding.

I started my graduate training in 1985, and I finished my academic career in 2016. That's 30 years. And for most of that, I was pretty... solid in my delight to be not only a professor, but also a researcher. It was trustworthy. And then that stopped, and we'll see. So now we have the researchers, and they're winding up quite the storm because Trump is threatening their research funding.

I started my graduate training in 1985, and I finished my academic career in 2016. That's 30 years. And for most of that, I was pretty... solid in my delight to be not only a professor, but also a researcher. It was trustworthy. And then that stopped, and we'll see. So now we have the researchers, and they're winding up quite the storm because Trump is threatening their research funding.