Jordi Hays

It feels like to make it cool, it's got to be on the PGA Tour.

The heroes that people look to need to be using this actively for the golf community to really put it together.

I'm Googling Robert De Niro's casino glasses.

Yeah, these are pretty bulky here.

We can share this in the chat here.

Boom, pull those up.

Let's continue.

You can buy range finders for around 150 bucks.

They're not fragile.

Also, a lot of golf heads, they're out there for more than the battery life.

They're out there for more than three, three and a half hours.

Three and a half hours might be enough for nine on a busy course.

They're doing six hours out there sometimes.

You don't wanna be out there with your augmented reality glasses and they die on you.

Are DIYers gonna drop this much money just so they can have easy access tips for their home projects?

Are startups gonna be willing to drop 2K for every employee who wants to collaborate in AR?

All of these are examples touted on Snap's specs page as things you can do with the glasses and the features do seem super cool.

It's just hard to imagine any one of them justifying a 2K price tag, especially because they look painful to wear.

And so that's your point about killer features.

I disagree.