Joscha Bach

and, uh, I'm not saying this because I hate people, but they personally, as human beings, there was something present that was not there in Chet Chibiti, which was why I was covering for them. But, uh, ChatGPT has an interesting ability. It does give people superpowers. And the people who feel threatened by them are the prompt completers.

and, uh, I'm not saying this because I hate people, but they personally, as human beings, there was something present that was not there in Chet Chibiti, which was why I was covering for them. But, uh, ChatGPT has an interesting ability. It does give people superpowers. And the people who feel threatened by them are the prompt completers.

They are the people who do what ChatGPT is doing right now. So if you are not creative, if you don't build your own thoughts, if you don't have actual plans in the world, and your only job is to summarize emails and to expand simple intentions into emails again, then ChatGPT might look like a threat.

They are the people who do what ChatGPT is doing right now. So if you are not creative, if you don't build your own thoughts, if you don't have actual plans in the world, and your only job is to summarize emails and to expand simple intentions into emails again, then ChatGPT might look like a threat.

They are the people who do what ChatGPT is doing right now. So if you are not creative, if you don't build your own thoughts, if you don't have actual plans in the world, and your only job is to summarize emails and to expand simple intentions into emails again, then ChatGPT might look like a threat.

But I believe that it is a very beneficial technology that allows us to create more interesting stuff and make the world more beautiful and fascinating if we find to build it into our life in the right ways. So I'm quite fascinated by these large language models, but I also think that they are by no means the final development. And it's interesting to see how this development progresses.

But I believe that it is a very beneficial technology that allows us to create more interesting stuff and make the world more beautiful and fascinating if we find to build it into our life in the right ways. So I'm quite fascinated by these large language models, but I also think that they are by no means the final development. And it's interesting to see how this development progresses.

But I believe that it is a very beneficial technology that allows us to create more interesting stuff and make the world more beautiful and fascinating if we find to build it into our life in the right ways. So I'm quite fascinated by these large language models, but I also think that they are by no means the final development. And it's interesting to see how this development progresses.

One thing that the out-of-the-box vanilla language models have as a limitation is that they have still some limited coherence and ability to construct complexity. And even though they exceed human abilities to do what they can do one shot,

One thing that the out-of-the-box vanilla language models have as a limitation is that they have still some limited coherence and ability to construct complexity. And even though they exceed human abilities to do what they can do one shot,

One thing that the out-of-the-box vanilla language models have as a limitation is that they have still some limited coherence and ability to construct complexity. And even though they exceed human abilities to do what they can do one shot,

Typically, when you write a text with a language model or using it, or when you write code for the language model, it's not one shot because they're going to be bugs in your program and design errors and compiler errors and so on. And your language model can help you to fix those things. But this process is out of the box, not automated yet.

Typically, when you write a text with a language model or using it, or when you write code for the language model, it's not one shot because they're going to be bugs in your program and design errors and compiler errors and so on. And your language model can help you to fix those things. But this process is out of the box, not automated yet.

Typically, when you write a text with a language model or using it, or when you write code for the language model, it's not one shot because they're going to be bugs in your program and design errors and compiler errors and so on. And your language model can help you to fix those things. But this process is out of the box, not automated yet.

So there is a management process that also needs to be done. And there are some interesting developments, baby AGI and so on, that are trying to automate this management process as well. And I suspect that soon we are going to see a bunch of cognitive architectures where every module is in some sense a language model or something equivalent.

So there is a management process that also needs to be done. And there are some interesting developments, baby AGI and so on, that are trying to automate this management process as well. And I suspect that soon we are going to see a bunch of cognitive architectures where every module is in some sense a language model or something equivalent.

So there is a management process that also needs to be done. And there are some interesting developments, baby AGI and so on, that are trying to automate this management process as well. And I suspect that soon we are going to see a bunch of cognitive architectures where every module is in some sense a language model or something equivalent.

And between the language models, we exchange suitable data structures, not English, and produce compound behavior of this whole thing.

And between the language models, we exchange suitable data structures, not English, and produce compound behavior of this whole thing.

And between the language models, we exchange suitable data structures, not English, and produce compound behavior of this whole thing.