Joscha Bach
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
It doesn't get agency how it's actually implemented. It wouldn't stay in that state for very long.
It doesn't get agency how it's actually implemented. It wouldn't stay in that state for very long.
Yeah. Of course, there might be a lot of stuff happening in between because if you have a system that works at a much higher frame rate than us, And even though it looks very short to us, maybe for the system there's a much longer subjective time, which things are unpleasant.
Yeah. Of course, there might be a lot of stuff happening in between because if you have a system that works at a much higher frame rate than us, And even though it looks very short to us, maybe for the system there's a much longer subjective time, which things are unpleasant.
Yeah. Of course, there might be a lot of stuff happening in between because if you have a system that works at a much higher frame rate than us, And even though it looks very short to us, maybe for the system there's a much longer subjective time, which things are unpleasant.
Well, of course it makes you lazy because you no longer see the point. So it doesn't make you not lazy. It just, in some sense, adapts you to what you perceive as your true circumstances.
Well, of course it makes you lazy because you no longer see the point. So it doesn't make you not lazy. It just, in some sense, adapts you to what you perceive as your true circumstances.
Well, of course it makes you lazy because you no longer see the point. So it doesn't make you not lazy. It just, in some sense, adapts you to what you perceive as your true circumstances.
Not necessarily. I suspect that the monks who are self-immolated for their political beliefs to make statements about the occupation of Tibet by China, they're probably being able to regulate their physical pain in any way they wanted to. And their suffering was the spiritual suffering that was the result of their choice that they made of what they wanted to identify as.
Not necessarily. I suspect that the monks who are self-immolated for their political beliefs to make statements about the occupation of Tibet by China, they're probably being able to regulate their physical pain in any way they wanted to. And their suffering was the spiritual suffering that was the result of their choice that they made of what they wanted to identify as.
Not necessarily. I suspect that the monks who are self-immolated for their political beliefs to make statements about the occupation of Tibet by China, they're probably being able to regulate their physical pain in any way they wanted to. And their suffering was the spiritual suffering that was the result of their choice that they made of what they wanted to identify as.
So stage five doesn't necessarily mean that you have no identity anymore, but you can choose your identity. You can make it instrumental to the world that you want to have.
So stage five doesn't necessarily mean that you have no identity anymore, but you can choose your identity. You can make it instrumental to the world that you want to have.
So stage five doesn't necessarily mean that you have no identity anymore, but you can choose your identity. You can make it instrumental to the world that you want to have.
One thing that I find concerning in the discussion of his arguments is that many people are dismissive of his arguments, but the counterarguments that they're giving are not very convincing to me. Based on this state of discussion, I find that from Eliezer's perspective, and I think I can take that perspective to some approximate degree,
One thing that I find concerning in the discussion of his arguments is that many people are dismissive of his arguments, but the counterarguments that they're giving are not very convincing to me. Based on this state of discussion, I find that from Eliezer's perspective, and I think I can take that perspective to some approximate degree,
One thing that I find concerning in the discussion of his arguments is that many people are dismissive of his arguments, but the counterarguments that they're giving are not very convincing to me. Based on this state of discussion, I find that from Eliezer's perspective, and I think I can take that perspective to some approximate degree,
That probably isn't normally at his intellectual level, but I think I see what he's up to and why he feels the way he does, and it makes total sense. I think that his perspective is somewhat similar to the perspective of Ted Kaczynski, the infamous lunar bomber. And not that Eliezer would be willing to send pipe bombs to anybody to blow them up, but
That probably isn't normally at his intellectual level, but I think I see what he's up to and why he feels the way he does, and it makes total sense. I think that his perspective is somewhat similar to the perspective of Ted Kaczynski, the infamous lunar bomber. And not that Eliezer would be willing to send pipe bombs to anybody to blow them up, but
That probably isn't normally at his intellectual level, but I think I see what he's up to and why he feels the way he does, and it makes total sense. I think that his perspective is somewhat similar to the perspective of Ted Kaczynski, the infamous lunar bomber. And not that Eliezer would be willing to send pipe bombs to anybody to blow them up, but