Josh Dubin
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
And, you know, what the federal court is saying is that, yeah, they could damage his credibility at trial, but they didn't know... obviously, because he does it later, that he made the whole thing up. And they didn't know that he's admitted he made the whole thing up. And importantly, who walks in unsolicited To the FBI and says, here's what I did.
And I want to clear my conscience and I want to tell you what I did.
And I want to clear my conscience and I want to tell you what I did.
And I want to clear my conscience and I want to tell you what I did.
Yeah. And it's a crime to lie. And I knew I started to feel like, oh, OK, we're about to get hometown, small town. Something bad is happening here because. This should have been a moment to – here we are, myself, my co-counsel.
Yeah. And it's a crime to lie. And I knew I started to feel like, oh, OK, we're about to get hometown, small town. Something bad is happening here because. This should have been a moment to – here we are, myself, my co-counsel.
Yeah. And it's a crime to lie. And I knew I started to feel like, oh, OK, we're about to get hometown, small town. Something bad is happening here because. This should have been a moment to – here we are, myself, my co-counsel.
We're about to change the trajectory not of just these four men's lives but of their families that have lived under the crushing weight of these wrongful convictions for three decades. My client, John Edwards, and Al Cleveland and the other two as well, Lenworth and Benson – John is in, Al is out, but Al is suffering the most horrific psychological damage you can imagine.
We're about to change the trajectory not of just these four men's lives but of their families that have lived under the crushing weight of these wrongful convictions for three decades. My client, John Edwards, and Al Cleveland and the other two as well, Lenworth and Benson – John is in, Al is out, but Al is suffering the most horrific psychological damage you can imagine.
We're about to change the trajectory not of just these four men's lives but of their families that have lived under the crushing weight of these wrongful convictions for three decades. My client, John Edwards, and Al Cleveland and the other two as well, Lenworth and Benson – John is in, Al is out, but Al is suffering the most horrific psychological damage you can imagine.
And John calls me from prison all the time. JD tells us that he is going to file a joint motion. joint meeting between defense counsel and the prosecutor to grant these men a new trial that's the procedural mechanism based on new evidence based on new evidence which is the 2004 recantation which they never had the benefit of of taking the trial that evidence was never seen
And John calls me from prison all the time. JD tells us that he is going to file a joint motion. joint meeting between defense counsel and the prosecutor to grant these men a new trial that's the procedural mechanism based on new evidence based on new evidence which is the 2004 recantation which they never had the benefit of of taking the trial that evidence was never seen
And John calls me from prison all the time. JD tells us that he is going to file a joint motion. joint meeting between defense counsel and the prosecutor to grant these men a new trial that's the procedural mechanism based on new evidence based on new evidence which is the 2004 recantation which they never had the benefit of of taking the trial that evidence was never seen
And then the 2006 affidavit and that once the new trial was granted, he would dismiss the case. So that all gets filed in front of one judge because it really should have been a matter of procedure in all my years of doing this.
And then the 2006 affidavit and that once the new trial was granted, he would dismiss the case. So that all gets filed in front of one judge because it really should have been a matter of procedure in all my years of doing this.
And then the 2006 affidavit and that once the new trial was granted, he would dismiss the case. So that all gets filed in front of one judge because it really should have been a matter of procedure in all my years of doing this.
25 years, 24 years, have never seen a judge do anything other than have the hearing and respect what the prosecutor has filed for and asked for, especially when it's joined by the defense. So all of a sudden, the judge that this has filed before is silent. Now, the clock is ticking because now we have the whole month of December. And after January 6th, he's out of office.
25 years, 24 years, have never seen a judge do anything other than have the hearing and respect what the prosecutor has filed for and asked for, especially when it's joined by the defense. So all of a sudden, the judge that this has filed before is silent. Now, the clock is ticking because now we have the whole month of December. And after January 6th, he's out of office.
25 years, 24 years, have never seen a judge do anything other than have the hearing and respect what the prosecutor has filed for and asked for, especially when it's joined by the defense. So all of a sudden, the judge that this has filed before is silent. Now, the clock is ticking because now we have the whole month of December. And after January 6th, he's out of office.
And right away, within a few days of us filing this joint motion, there's a newspaper article that comes out. What's your local paper again? The Chronicle Telegraph. Telegraph or Telegram? The Chronicle Telegram. And it has the person that just defeated him in the election. His name is Tony Sillow.