Josh Dubin

So the same judge that you just said, shout out, which was exactly my sentiment, issues another order. You could not get a more stark 180 degree turn than this. I'm going to quote from that order.

How can it be possibly an emergency that a hearing and potential ruling be accomplished in a matter of weeks for a case and cases that have been pending for almost three decades, not to mention four years on the current prosecutor's watch?

How can it be possibly an emergency that a hearing and potential ruling be accomplished in a matter of weeks for a case and cases that have been pending for almost three decades, not to mention four years on the current prosecutor's watch?

How can it be possibly an emergency that a hearing and potential ruling be accomplished in a matter of weeks for a case and cases that have been pending for almost three decades, not to mention four years on the current prosecutor's watch?

Moreover, no rational person would conclude that a change in county prosecutor constitutes an emergency, an inconvenience to the movement, to the movements, arguably a delay in rulings, no doubt, but an emergency. I don't think so. In addition to the lack of emergency, two additional but troubling issues are apparent by this motion. This is three days later.

Moreover, no rational person would conclude that a change in county prosecutor constitutes an emergency, an inconvenience to the movement, to the movements, arguably a delay in rulings, no doubt, but an emergency. I don't think so. In addition to the lack of emergency, two additional but troubling issues are apparent by this motion. This is three days later.

Moreover, no rational person would conclude that a change in county prosecutor constitutes an emergency, an inconvenience to the movement, to the movements, arguably a delay in rulings, no doubt, but an emergency. I don't think so. In addition to the lack of emergency, two additional but troubling issues are apparent by this motion. This is three days later.

First, the movements go to great pains to paint the incoming prosecutor as incapable of fairly and rationally evaluating the defendant's claims of innocence and requests for new trial. To pause there because this man had sat and listened to and dove through and tore through this entire trial record. So, yeah, we had concerns that we would face further delay. It already agreed. We filed.

First, the movements go to great pains to paint the incoming prosecutor as incapable of fairly and rationally evaluating the defendant's claims of innocence and requests for new trial. To pause there because this man had sat and listened to and dove through and tore through this entire trial record. So, yeah, we had concerns that we would face further delay. It already agreed. We filed.

First, the movements go to great pains to paint the incoming prosecutor as incapable of fairly and rationally evaluating the defendant's claims of innocence and requests for new trial. To pause there because this man had sat and listened to and dove through and tore through this entire trial record. So, yeah, we had concerns that we would face further delay. It already agreed. We filed.

This is oftentimes right away. The court will call a hearing and grant the relief. So the judge goes on to say this effort is unfounded. Contra the movement's reliance on a newspaper article. That's the one I was talking about. The same article quotes prosecutor-elect Silla was saying he would review the matter anew, just like prosecutor Tomlinson did. And it goes on to say.

This is oftentimes right away. The court will call a hearing and grant the relief. So the judge goes on to say this effort is unfounded. Contra the movement's reliance on a newspaper article. That's the one I was talking about. The same article quotes prosecutor-elect Silla was saying he would review the matter anew, just like prosecutor Tomlinson did. And it goes on to say.

This is oftentimes right away. The court will call a hearing and grant the relief. So the judge goes on to say this effort is unfounded. Contra the movement's reliance on a newspaper article. That's the one I was talking about. The same article quotes prosecutor-elect Silla was saying he would review the matter anew, just like prosecutor Tomlinson did. And it goes on to say.

Second, even more troubling is the movement's assertion that Tomlinson's successor has no authority to review agreements made by Tomlinson. I've never seen this in an opinion before. Oh, really? With a question mark. The movement's right that Mr. Tomlinson's successor has an obligation to honor the good faith decisions made by the prior administration, J.D.

Second, even more troubling is the movement's assertion that Tomlinson's successor has no authority to review agreements made by Tomlinson. I've never seen this in an opinion before. Oh, really? With a question mark. The movement's right that Mr. Tomlinson's successor has an obligation to honor the good faith decisions made by the prior administration, J.D.

Second, even more troubling is the movement's assertion that Tomlinson's successor has no authority to review agreements made by Tomlinson. I've never seen this in an opinion before. Oh, really? With a question mark. The movement's right that Mr. Tomlinson's successor has an obligation to honor the good faith decisions made by the prior administration, J.D.

And it then goes on to use the Head Start case, the Nancy Smith case and Joe Allen, where he granted these people, he exonerated these people. He then goes on to throw it in their face, in my opinion. He says, recall the Head Start case. And he goes through personalizing this and saying that because J.D.

And it then goes on to use the Head Start case, the Nancy Smith case and Joe Allen, where he granted these people, he exonerated these people. He then goes on to throw it in their face, in my opinion. He says, recall the Head Start case. And he goes through personalizing this and saying that because J.D.

And it then goes on to use the Head Start case, the Nancy Smith case and Joe Allen, where he granted these people, he exonerated these people. He then goes on to throw it in their face, in my opinion. He says, recall the Head Start case. And he goes through personalizing this and saying that because J.D.

Tomlinson exonerated these people, thereby undoing a prior administration's prosecution, that why should the same not apply to you? So in other words, three days before he says, why should justice wait? Three days later, He says. What? Wait a second. This should wait and it should wait. And by the way. Here's one to poke this man in the eye because he exonerated people.