Josh Holmes

Yeah.

I mean, listen, I think you got to get back to the basics at some level, because I do think that the vast majority of Americans at some level understand that a functioning judicial system is pretty imperative to our way of life.

But you've seen in blue places.

I mean, we're talking about Minnesota.

That's a great example.

We saw it in D.C., too, with a bunch of different arrests after the Trump National Guard deal and everything else where they somebody would commit some kind of an assault and a jury would

just find them not guilty.

We gotta get back to the basics on this stuff.

If you do not have a functioning court system, or a system where a jury of your peers is basically just a red lot, blue lot lineup, and if I get the vast majority of blue versus red, we have a mistrial or something else, and we can send people on their way, it's problematic.

I mean, you're seeing this time after time after time,

It became a problem with the whole Alex Soros judge purchase.

But now it's beating into a point where you have elected officials who basically, I mean, it's almost a litmus test of whether or not if you find a Democrat guilty of crimes.

Well, you're a sellout.

Well, I worry, though, about getting back to basics while in the midst of retreating on the issue.

And that's what I worry about with the Trump administration right now, because it's entirely asymmetrical to, I think, the point we've all made here.

It's like conservatives, we want to protect our fellow American.

These liberals, they want to kill us.

Exactly.

You know?

And so if we have some sort of detente that then turns into a retreat on enforcing the rule of law, they're going to learn the lesson that they can win.