Josh Welch

We're going to, on the shadow docket, issue a three sentence opinion saying, no, we're going to stay that order and allow them to continue doing what they're doing.

And so that's the pattern.

And that's the court's way of taking immediate action, which goes against everything the court has said that they like, which is full briefing.

They like to hear everything from the lawyers.

They like to be methodical.

They like to

be intellectual, blah, blah, blah.

All that's bullshit.

They're making these decisions, like you said, for financial and or improper reasons.

And they're siding with Trump most of the time, if not all.

because it creates chaos because when you have a two or three sentence order from the shadow docket that overturns years of precedent, and you have no rationale or reason for lower courts to follow why this is the law now.

And so it throws this whole concept of stare decisis or precedence into chaos because the lower courts don't know how to interpret a two or three sentence order.

And in law, like previous decisions guide everything like it's a very important concept.

And so, yeah.

And another thing, too, is that you have a lot of federal judges right now.

And a lot of them are conservative federal judges, but they're also rule of law federal judges that are seeing that this administration is turning the rule of law upside down.

And it's an interesting dichotomy because these judges are conservative, a lot of them appointed by conservative presidents, but they also are losing or seeing the slow deterioration of the rule of law by this president with his policies and the rules and regulations he's attempting to pass.

And so you see this

dichotomy with them.

They don't like this.