Judge Susan Crawford
speaker
75 appearances
12 recordings
1 series
first heard Jan 2025
last heard May 2025
Judge Susan Crawford’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
The MeidasTouch Podcast · Molly Jong-Fast reacts to Trump’s Attacks On Americans · 24 May 2025
podcast
Hi everyone, it's Judge Jeanine. I'm at the water cooler in the United States Attorney's Office in Washington, D.C. And you may recall that the United States gave something like $44 billion a year through USAID for things like dance classes in Wuhan, China, and Sesame Street in Iraq.
But here in the United States, in the United States Attorney's Office, where we prosecute crime on behalf of the victims, On behalf of the people who are targeted by criminals, the U.S. attorneys, as well as the staff, in order to get water, they have to join a water club. And they have to pay. It's a dues-paying membership. And today they asked for our patience. Why?
Because we couldn't get water delivered today. Today there was no water delivered to the United States.
I'll be brief so you can hear from these amazing people. Congratulations to everyone on 100 days that's been unparalleled in my memory and best I can tell ever.
for all other oligarchs and she goes we won play this clip someone who watches out for people but i've got to tell you as a little girl growing up in chippewa falls i never could have imagined that i'd be taking on the richest man in the world for justice in Wisconsin, and we won.
So today, Wisconsinites fended off an unprecedented attack on our democracy. Our fair elections and our Supreme Court and Wisconsin's stood up and said loudly that justice does not have a price. Our courts are not for sale.
The MeidasTouch Podcast · Trump Suffers Major Defeat in Wisconsin Supreme Court Blowout · 2 Apr 2025
podcast
Listen to what he says, listen to his words. And he's talked about begging on his knees for campaign contributions, wearing out his knee pads. He's saying that he wants to be on the court to be part of Donald Trump's support network. You just gotta listen to what the guy says. He wants to be on the court to push a partisan agenda.
He wants to be there to support Elon Musk and to support Donald Trump and Doge. And that's really not what the court's for. And I've said over and over, I wanna be on the court to protect the people of Wisconsin under our constitution and laws. Brad Schimel's got a whole different agenda.
It was just a one-time thing. That's what Brad Schimel said when he gave a, quote, sweet bargain to a man who sexually assaulted a 10-year-old girl. The sex predator served just 18 months in prison for his crime and got out. A few weeks ago, he was convicted of sexually assaulting a child again. And that was just one time Brad Schimel let a sex predator loose on our kids.
So why would we ever give him another chance? Brad Schimel.
It's laughable. Let me explain why I say that, Ben. And by the way, it's great to be with you. Any meeting of the national security principals, this is the cabinet level senior most national security team, and that's what this was.
is by definition in itself on almost every possible occasion, those are classified discussions because even the topics that they choose to discuss tells our adversaries something of relevance. So having a meeting of the National Security Council principles is by itself a classified matter. Then next, here we are,
talking about whether or not and when and how the United States should attack a foreign adversary. The fact of that conversation and its contents is inherently classified because if an adversary were to have the ability to learn of those plans and intentions in advance, then that adversary could prepare.
both by hardening their defenses or evading attack, but more worryingly, by going after the United States and our assets as we conduct the attack. So military plans and operations are inherently classified. Add to that
that we know from Jeff Goldberg's reporting that Pete Hegseth, the defense secretary, shared sensitive military plans, including attack targets, timing, sequencing, the ordnance or the bomb types that they were going to use. That is all inherently classified. Tulsi Gabbard is either lying or being deliberately evasive by trying to say no intelligence material was shared.
She may be trying to be very cute by half and suggesting that no product produced by the intelligence community, as opposed to the Defense Department, was shared on that chat. We have no way of knowing that. We do know, apparently, that the CIA director exposed a covert operative's name on the chat. That's inherently classified.
But more to the point, then, let me explain how national security decision-making is supposed to work. If you're having a meeting of this National Security Principles Committee, as we call it, it is typically held in person in the White House Situation Room, which is a very secure facility in the basement of the White House. You're not allowed to take your phone into the Situation Room.
You're not allowed to take your Apple Watch into the Situation Room. You leave all of that outside because those devices – we know can be hacked by our adversaries and used as listening devices so that the Russians could be listening to everything said in the Situation Room if you brought your phone in.
We conduct meetings of the national security principals and deputies in the Situation Room precisely so that we have that kind of secure bubble that can't be infiltrated by our adversaries.
And if the principals individually or collectively are not in Washington, not able to gather in the Situation Room, or maybe it's late at night and they need a way to communicate securely, we have all kinds of setups for that.
Showing 1–20 of 75 · page 1 of 4
Next →