Julia Longoria

What? No, no, no, no. Here comes the craziest part of the story.

It's like a double Trojan horse. A horse within a horse. Because after the Fred Gilbert debacle, there was another case at the Supreme Court that afternoon.

It's like a double Trojan horse. A horse within a horse. Because after the Fred Gilbert debacle, there was another case at the Supreme Court that afternoon.

It's like a double Trojan horse. A horse within a horse. Because after the Fred Gilbert debacle, there was another case at the Supreme Court that afternoon.

By none other than Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

By none other than Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

By none other than Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

So I couldn't confirm that for sure. I don't even know how you would do that. But what I can tell you is that she arranged to go second because she knew there was probably a good chance that Fred, the completely incompetent lawyer... was going to be, you know, less than amazing.

So I couldn't confirm that for sure. I don't even know how you would do that. But what I can tell you is that she arranged to go second because she knew there was probably a good chance that Fred, the completely incompetent lawyer... was going to be, you know, less than amazing.

So I couldn't confirm that for sure. I don't even know how you would do that. But what I can tell you is that she arranged to go second because she knew there was probably a good chance that Fred, the completely incompetent lawyer... was going to be, you know, less than amazing.

And then she told Justice Stevens, even in this case, where it seems like men are the ones who are being discriminated against, beneath that discrimination is a more insidious one.

And then she told Justice Stevens, even in this case, where it seems like men are the ones who are being discriminated against, beneath that discrimination is a more insidious one.

And then she told Justice Stevens, even in this case, where it seems like men are the ones who are being discriminated against, beneath that discrimination is a more insidious one.

They go back and forth a bit. Justice Stevens is basically like, why do you keep insisting on this? Like, why do you keep saying that discrimination against men contains within it discrimination against women? They're different. And she's like, no, they're not different.

They go back and forth a bit. Justice Stevens is basically like, why do you keep insisting on this? Like, why do you keep saying that discrimination against men contains within it discrimination against women? They're different. And she's like, no, they're not different.

They go back and forth a bit. Justice Stevens is basically like, why do you keep insisting on this? Like, why do you keep saying that discrimination against men contains within it discrimination against women? They're different. And she's like, no, they're not different.

She makes this point again and again. All discrimination based on gender is bad, and it should be checked with something at least approaching that hardcore standard that the court uses for race.

She makes this point again and again. All discrimination based on gender is bad, and it should be checked with something at least approaching that hardcore standard that the court uses for race.

She makes this point again and again. All discrimination based on gender is bad, and it should be checked with something at least approaching that hardcore standard that the court uses for race.

About two months later, December 20th, 1976, Justice William Brennan announces that the court is striking down the beer law.