Julie Kelly

Jack Smith also claiming last month and today that classified documents, highly sensitive documents, classified documents were found in boxes in a ballroom and bathroom at Mar-a-Lago.

That is not true.

There is no way that Jack Smith could prove that.

In fact, at the end of the documents case before Judge Cannon tossed that indictment in July of 2024, one of his lead prosecutors had to disclose that they didn't even know if these alleged classified papers were in the boxes that had been moved around Mar-a-Lago that represented the basis of the obstruction charge.

I know I'm getting in the details here, but he's making claims under oath about these cases that he cannot prove.

And I hope that the DOJ and Congress follows up on that.

Um, no, I don't think so.

They really were struggling at one point.

They were interrupting, um,

Even Jack Smith, when he was trying to answer, the Democrats were, they were so riled up about the directness of the lines of questioning from Republicans.

So you could see at the end, then Jamie Raskin at the end said, well, if this report on the documents case is allowed to be released by the court, we're going to have Jack Smith back here so he can answer questions about the documents case.

So I think that's a telling sign.

If they thought that this was a home run, Jamie Raskin, shrewd,

shrewd as he is, he would say, all right, that's all we need to hear from Jack Smith.

But he was hinting that he might want to have him come back a third time.

So no, it definitely was a disaster for Jack Smith.

I think that there are still a lot of things that we need to learn and expose as to what he did in both of those cases.

And hopefully there will be another opportunity.

I think the Senate wants to call him in as well.

So let's hope that that's the case.