Julie Kelly

But both Jack Smith and President Trump have one thing in common.

I think it's their only point of agreement in, you know, three plus years is that they want both wanted to see his testimony in public under oath before this committee.

And that's finally going to happen tomorrow at 10 o'clock Eastern time.

I will be covering it live on X Julie underscore Kelly, too.

I'm sure, you know, I'll be talking about it tomorrow evening.

evening.

But Steve, if anyone better represents the vengeful, reckless, punitive, destructive lawfare against Donald Trump and his associates over the last few years, it is special counsel Jack Smith.

And what I laid out in my piece at Substack Declassified with Julie Kelly, I outlined 10 questions, 10 areas that

that the Republicans need to hammer the $50 million man, I call him.

He's cost taxpayers $50 million in less than two years as the special counsel.

So when we can get into some of the details about what I talk about here, but it is vital for Republicans to take this opportunity and expose Jack Smith for the degenerate dirt bag that he is so that people can see what the president had to deal with for two years.

I mean, they absolutely have to go for the jugular here.

So I would say, and this was the first question that I posed, that they need to confront Jack Smith with.

And this is something that the media, when they covered Jack Smith's testimony last month, completely ignored Steve.

Judge Aileen Cannon in July of 2024 dismissed the documents case after determining the Jack Smith's appointment violated the Constitution, violated the appointments clause because he was not appointed by the president.

He was not confirmed by the Senate.

He acted as a principal officer, i.e.

a U.S.

attorney.

So she tossed the indictment.