Julie Kelly

I didn't want them to spend too much time on that.

I don't think that they did.

And they did tie it into the larger unconstitutional behavior of Jack Smith.

And I think there were some interesting nuggets that were disclosed today that the committee and Republican leaders in both the House and Senate and perhaps the Department of Justice should follow up on.

And I think that Smith's testimony opened the door

just like last December for at least some false statement charges against him and certainly other charges related to his misconduct as special counsel.

Well, I think he perjured himself on a couple of instances and I brought this up in my piece, my sub stack piece.

Number one,

He claimed under oath last month and today that Donald Trump obstructed the investigation into classified documents.

That is a provable lie.

Jack Smith also claiming last month and today that classified documents, highly sensitive documents, classified documents were found in boxes in a ballroom and bathroom at Mar-a-Lago.

That is not true.

There is no way that Jack Smith could prove that.

In fact, at the end of the documents case before Judge Cannon tossed that indictment in July of 2024, one of his lead prosecutors had to disclose that they didn't even know if these alleged classified papers were in the boxes that had been moved around Mar-a-Lago that represented the basis of the obstruction charge.

I know I'm getting in the details here, but he's making claims under oath about these cases that he cannot prove.

And I hope that the DOJ and Congress follows up on that.

Um, no, I don't think so.

They really were struggling at one point.

They were interrupting, um,

Even Jack Smith, when he was trying to answer, the Democrats were, they were so riled up about the directness of the lines of questioning from Republicans.