Julie Kelly

So when we can get into some of the details about what I talk about here, but it is vital for Republicans to take this opportunity and expose Jack Smith for the degenerate dirt bag that he is so that people can see what the president had to deal with for two years.

I mean, they absolutely have to go for the jugular here.

So I would say, and this was the first question that I posed, that they need to confront Jack Smith with.

And this is something that the media, when they covered Jack Smith's testimony last month, completely ignored Steve.

Judge Aileen Cannon in July of 2024 dismissed the documents case after determining the Jack Smith's appointment violated the Constitution, violated the appointments clause because he was not appointed by the president.

He was not confirmed by the Senate.

He acted as a principal officer, i.e.

a U.S.

attorney.

So she tossed the indictment.

Up until the time that Jack Smith left office in January 2025, he was still signing his name, Special Counsel Jack Smith, on motions and briefs filed in the documents case.

Now, compare that, Steve, with what's happening this week, actually yesterday.

Judge David Novak in the Eastern District of Virginia threatening to...

bring a false statements charge against Lindsay Halligan for also signing her name as U.S.

Attorney Lindsay Halligan after a separate judge dismissed the Comey and Tish James indictments, finding that her appointment violated the Constitution.

So, again, a huge disparity in the rules.

I would also speak to Jack Smith's testimony last week when he made several misrepresentations.

I'll say nicely, I'd rather call them lies.

He said that there were classified documents found in boxes in the ballroom and bathroom of Mar-a-Lago.

He has zero proof of that.