Julie Kelly

I mean, what this FBI was up to for four years.

It's hard to see how it can be significantly reformed in a way that can earn back the trust of the American people, especially the political right.

So that's what I would like to hear from Dan.

And I'm sure he will have a lot of juicy tidbits for us to nibble on and also just hear about his experience there.

Yes, they are.

And, uh, of course we know, and I reported on this Jack Smith leaking his opening remarks to, uh, friendly news organizations who posted what he was going to say behind closed doors, which was the defense of both his January 6th indictment and the documents case against the president.

I heard that, um, he was very arrogant in the proceedings, which is not a surprise because that's how we've seen him conduct himself for years.

Um, he appeared very haggard apparently.

So maybe that's a good sign that this is wearing him down.

But this has to be step one, Steve, in the accountability, pulp ability for Jack Smith and his team of thugs for what he put this country through for almost two years after his appointment on constitutional appointment, by the way, by attorney general Merrick Garland.

So I'm sure we'll get more leaks tonight.

We already saw Jamie Raskin make a comment saying that he was schooling House Republicans on both indictments.

I highly doubt it.

Well, I mean, of course, that's going to be the spin.

However, Politico and you and I talked about this this morning, is that it appeared that Jack Smith was going to be very obstinate and stonewall any answers.

We saw this from

one of his henchmen, Thomas Windham, who was one of the lead prosecutors in the J6 case.

He refused to answer even basic questions, which resulted in a criminal referral to the DOJ last month for obstruction of Congress against Tom Windham.

Don't know the status of that criminal referral.

But look, Jack Smith has to be at the top of the list.