Julie Kelly

So why is the one angle, and this is related to the quote-unquote new footage that they released last week, why is that camera at one frame per second when the other camera is not?

So why is the one angle, and this is related to the quote-unquote new footage that they released last week, why is that camera at one frame per second when the other camera is not?

So why is the one angle, and this is related to the quote-unquote new footage that they released last week, why is that camera at one frame per second when the other camera is not?

Well, what the FBI did and stupidly thought no one would catch it, which we did, is they slowed down the frame rate on the faster camera to make it look like it was in sync from the two different angles of the pipe bomber allegedly setting the device down. So of course we found that and expose that as well.

Well, what the FBI did and stupidly thought no one would catch it, which we did, is they slowed down the frame rate on the faster camera to make it look like it was in sync from the two different angles of the pipe bomber allegedly setting the device down. So of course we found that and expose that as well.

Well, what the FBI did and stupidly thought no one would catch it, which we did, is they slowed down the frame rate on the faster camera to make it look like it was in sync from the two different angles of the pipe bomber allegedly setting the device down. So of course we found that and expose that as well.

But what Darren has suggested in, you know, this too, is that because it's at one frame per second, that lends itself to easily doctoring the video even more. So Dan, this footage, the D the FBI has had since early 2021, because at that time in March of 2021, they posted a clip from that camera angle. at 7.43 when the pipe bomber sat down and used his phone.

But what Darren has suggested in, you know, this too, is that because it's at one frame per second, that lends itself to easily doctoring the video even more. So Dan, this footage, the D the FBI has had since early 2021, because at that time in March of 2021, they posted a clip from that camera angle. at 7.43 when the pipe bomber sat down and used his phone.

But what Darren has suggested in, you know, this too, is that because it's at one frame per second, that lends itself to easily doctoring the video even more. So Dan, this footage, the D the FBI has had since early 2021, because at that time in March of 2021, they posted a clip from that camera angle. at 7.43 when the pipe bomber sat down and used his phone.

So all of a sudden, magically, they have a new clip from the same camera angle just nine minutes later, but they release it the day after House Republicans blow open their phony investigation and their stonewalling by the FBI and misrepresentations by the guy who headed the investigation, Stephen D'Antuano. So, I mean, this is, again, they think that they're

So all of a sudden, magically, they have a new clip from the same camera angle just nine minutes later, but they release it the day after House Republicans blow open their phony investigation and their stonewalling by the FBI and misrepresentations by the guy who headed the investigation, Stephen D'Antuano. So, I mean, this is, again, they think that they're

So all of a sudden, magically, they have a new clip from the same camera angle just nine minutes later, but they release it the day after House Republicans blow open their phony investigation and their stonewalling by the FBI and misrepresentations by the guy who headed the investigation, Stephen D'Antuano. So, I mean, this is, again, they think that they're

convincing somebody, I don't know who, but all they do every time they post something or talk about it is give us more fodder for the belief that this was an inside job.

convincing somebody, I don't know who, but all they do every time they post something or talk about it is give us more fodder for the belief that this was an inside job.

convincing somebody, I don't know who, but all they do every time they post something or talk about it is give us more fodder for the belief that this was an inside job.

Exactly right. And, you know, and it's not just that this suspect put the device outside the DNC. We're told that the same suspect planted the device the night before in an alleyway between the RNC headquarters and Capitol Hill Club. So we're also supposed to believe that both of those devices were laying there, especially the DNC one, in plain sight for 18 hours.

Exactly right. And, you know, and it's not just that this suspect put the device outside the DNC. We're told that the same suspect planted the device the night before in an alleyway between the RNC headquarters and Capitol Hill Club. So we're also supposed to believe that both of those devices were laying there, especially the DNC one, in plain sight for 18 hours.

Exactly right. And, you know, and it's not just that this suspect put the device outside the DNC. We're told that the same suspect planted the device the night before in an alleyway between the RNC headquarters and Capitol Hill Club. So we're also supposed to believe that both of those devices were laying there, especially the DNC one, in plain sight for 18 hours.

before they just happened to be discovered around the same time the joint session of Congress convened at 1 o'clock, around the same time as the Ray Epps breach, the exterior line on the west side of the Capitol. All of this is just a huge coincidence. You know, yes, it's OK. Bomb sniffing canines twice missed the device sitting outside the DNC. Sure. OK. We're supposed to believe that, too.

before they just happened to be discovered around the same time the joint session of Congress convened at 1 o'clock, around the same time as the Ray Epps breach, the exterior line on the west side of the Capitol. All of this is just a huge coincidence. You know, yes, it's OK. Bomb sniffing canines twice missed the device sitting outside the DNC. Sure. OK. We're supposed to believe that, too.