Jury Foreman

That's fantasy.

We, the jury, find the defendant, Andrea Pia Yates, guilty of capital murder as charged in the indictment.

We, the jury, find the defendant, Andrea Pia Yates, guilty of capital murder as charged in the indictment.

We, the jury, find the defendant, Andrea Pia Yates, guilty of capital murder as charged in the indictment.

We got to the point, actually, that we realized for Charge 2, at some point, I think it was Jody, I'm pretty sure it was Jody, said, wait a minute, does the... intended act of harm have to be the death of George Floyd, or can it be him not providing the life support? And it was like, all of a sudden, light bulbs just went on for those people, I think, that were undecided or on the not guilty side.

We got to the point, actually, that we realized for Charge 2, at some point, I think it was Jody, I'm pretty sure it was Jody, said, wait a minute, does the... intended act of harm have to be the death of George Floyd, or can it be him not providing the life support? And it was like, all of a sudden, light bulbs just went on for those people, I think, that were undecided or on the not guilty side.

We got to the point, actually, that we realized for Charge 2, at some point, I think it was Jody, I'm pretty sure it was Jody, said, wait a minute, does the... intended act of harm have to be the death of George Floyd, or can it be him not providing the life support? And it was like, all of a sudden, light bulbs just went on for those people, I think, that were undecided or on the not guilty side.

We the jury in the above entitled cause.

We the jury in the above entitled cause.

We the jury in the above entitled cause.

Find the defendant Richard Joseph Hirshfield guilty.

Find the defendant Richard Joseph Hirshfield guilty.

Find the defendant Richard Joseph Hirshfield guilty.

We, the jury, find that the penalty shall be death.

We, the jury, find that the penalty shall be death.

We, the jury, find that the penalty shall be death.

And you have a husband-wife detective team, which is always fun. And then you throw a Texas Ranger in the mix, which, what could we love more than that?

And you have a husband-wife detective team, which is always fun. And then you throw a Texas Ranger in the mix, which, what could we love more than that?

And you have a husband-wife detective team, which is always fun. And then you throw a Texas Ranger in the mix, which, what could we love more than that?

I mean, I think it's pretty incredible that back in 95, first of all, they preserved the evidence so well that they still had enough DNA years later to do all of this testing. Not to mention the fact that they had tested multiple people over the years. The detectives wouldn't give up. They kept going back to this case.