Justin Wolfers

Das ist das, was ein Unwahrscheinlichkeitsschock macht. Unwahrscheinlichkeit führt zu einer Verringerung der Anforderungen. Und deshalb denke ich, dass wir in der Mitte davon sind. Und das ist das, was die Rezession-Targeteile verursacht hat. Das könnte in der Folge zu einem steigenden Unwahrscheinlichkeitsschock führen, einem steigenden Einkommen und niedrigeren Wagen.

Das ist das, was ein Unwahrscheinlichkeitsschock macht. Unwahrscheinlichkeit führt zu einer Verringerung der Anforderungen. Und deshalb denke ich, dass wir in der Mitte davon sind. Und das ist das, was die Rezession-Targeteile verursacht hat. Das könnte in der Folge zu einem steigenden Unwahrscheinlichkeitsschock führen, einem steigenden Einkommen und niedrigeren Wagen.

Das ist das, was ein Unwahrscheinlichkeitsschock macht. Unwahrscheinlichkeit führt zu einer Verringerung der Anforderungen. Und deshalb denke ich, dass wir in der Mitte davon sind. Und das ist das, was die Rezession-Targeteile verursacht hat. Das könnte in der Folge zu einem steigenden Unwahrscheinlichkeitsschock führen, einem steigenden Einkommen und niedrigeren Wagen.

Also das ist, wie es die täglichen Leute schlägt.

Also das ist, wie es die täglichen Leute schlägt.

Also das ist, wie es die täglichen Leute schlägt.

Actually, I think checking Kelshi is a pretty good idea, because the problem with talking to one economist is, you don't know if the guy you're talking to is honest. His left wing, his right wing is in the pocket of big something or other.

Actually, I think checking Kelshi is a pretty good idea, because the problem with talking to one economist is, you don't know if the guy you're talking to is honest. His left wing, his right wing is in the pocket of big something or other.

Actually, I think checking Kelshi is a pretty good idea, because the problem with talking to one economist is, you don't know if the guy you're talking to is honest. His left wing, his right wing is in the pocket of big something or other.

Well, no, I'll give a different answer then, which is, there's a lot of research showing the average of many economists is better than any individual economist. Okay. So, it's almost never worth saying, what is your forecast, Justin? What you should say is, Justin, what is the consensus of economists? Okay. Calci is sort of like that. It's a prediction market.

Well, no, I'll give a different answer then, which is, there's a lot of research showing the average of many economists is better than any individual economist. Okay. So, it's almost never worth saying, what is your forecast, Justin? What you should say is, Justin, what is the consensus of economists? Okay. Calci is sort of like that. It's a prediction market.

Well, no, I'll give a different answer then, which is, there's a lot of research showing the average of many economists is better than any individual economist. Okay. So, it's almost never worth saying, what is your forecast, Justin? What you should say is, Justin, what is the consensus of economists? Okay. Calci is sort of like that. It's a prediction market.

So, in fact, Steve Bannon's point is an excellent one. I tweeted 15 minutes ago that Goldman Sachs has cut its recession odds to 35%. Goldman's at the bottom end, but it's absolutely true that the odds of a recession have fallen since the China deal. Now, let me come back and I want to repeat a point I made earlier. but saying it slightly differently.

So, in fact, Steve Bannon's point is an excellent one. I tweeted 15 minutes ago that Goldman Sachs has cut its recession odds to 35%. Goldman's at the bottom end, but it's absolutely true that the odds of a recession have fallen since the China deal. Now, let me come back and I want to repeat a point I made earlier. but saying it slightly differently.

So, in fact, Steve Bannon's point is an excellent one. I tweeted 15 minutes ago that Goldman Sachs has cut its recession odds to 35%. Goldman's at the bottom end, but it's absolutely true that the odds of a recession have fallen since the China deal. Now, let me come back and I want to repeat a point I made earlier. but saying it slightly differently.

Every time Trump steps into tariffs, everyone puts out new research notes saying that the odds of recession have gone up. And every time Trump retreats, they re-evaluate and they say the odds have fallen. And the bigger the retreat, the bigger the revision. So what this says is, yes, the chances of recession have retreated. They've retreated because Trump has retreated from Trumpism.

Every time Trump steps into tariffs, everyone puts out new research notes saying that the odds of recession have gone up. And every time Trump retreats, they re-evaluate and they say the odds have fallen. And the bigger the retreat, the bigger the revision. So what this says is, yes, the chances of recession have retreated. They've retreated because Trump has retreated from Trumpism.

Every time Trump steps into tariffs, everyone puts out new research notes saying that the odds of recession have gone up. And every time Trump retreats, they re-evaluate and they say the odds have fallen. And the bigger the retreat, the bigger the revision. So what this says is, yes, the chances of recession have retreated. They've retreated because Trump has retreated from Trumpism.

If he kept doing that, we'd be in great shape. Vor etwa drei Monaten gab ich eine Vorstellung, die ich glaube, eine nützliche Regelung ist. Vielleicht war es vor zwei Monaten. Wenn Trump völlig zurückgeht. Eigentlich lassen Sie mich den puren Hintergrund geben. Am 20. Januar hätte ich gesagt, die Chancen einer Rezession mit einer normalen amerikanischen Regierung wären 10%.

If he kept doing that, we'd be in great shape. Vor etwa drei Monaten gab ich eine Vorstellung, die ich glaube, eine nützliche Regelung ist. Vielleicht war es vor zwei Monaten. Wenn Trump völlig zurückgeht. Eigentlich lassen Sie mich den puren Hintergrund geben. Am 20. Januar hätte ich gesagt, die Chancen einer Rezession mit einer normalen amerikanischen Regierung wären 10%.