Jyunmi Hatcher

And things that are... Of course, everything is interconnected in AI.

If one team does one thing, you're always going to hear about something from somewhere else.

So...

I mean, it's like it was a classification that is reserved for enemies of the state.

Or traditionally reserved for the enemies of the state.

Yeah, basically, and AI Daily Brief has a good breakdown of this as well.

But essentially, it's the military is saying, or Department of Defense or whatnot, are saying that they need or want to do anything that is technically legal.

And when it comes to the military, that's very white, such as monitoring citizenry, such as deploying, you know...

Military hardware, software, or any application that's technically legal.

Yeah, and I think there was an interesting point brought up in what I was reading and listening to was the particular place that Anthropic is in, right?

They...

essentially got started or at least they are they're known for um being more ai safety conscious right they they have they had more stricter uh parameters when they created their

constitutional AI and when a good deal of AI developers moved from open AI to create Anthropic.

And so Anthropic upholding its mission as an organization is now coming in direct conflict with

uh, military application when the, in their, uh, terms of use for, for their tools say, absolutely not.

You can't do any of those kinds of things, you know, and then people are going back and forth.

It's like, well, why did you take the military contract in the first place?

And, you know, and so anthropics in an interesting position, I think where they either need to still uphold their mission.

Otherwise they lose, uh,

What kind of helps differentiate them from everybody else?