Jyunmi

So he knew it was going to get like posted.

So he just wanted to like keep all information as clear as possible.

So and basically saying we're making one of the hardest decisions in history and we'll be straight about what's happening and why.

And it's basically naming like work is different.

Right.

We're we're reformatting around intelligence.

He actually does not mention AI, but he is clearly talking about all of those things.

Okay.

I mean in the note.

He's not saying... He's referencing it as intelligence.

And that may just be for the public version of the note.

Right?

They're giving people time to say goodbye.

There's a generous... There's a generous... You keep your benefits for X amount of time package.

But it is literally...

hey, we're looking at things in the context of what's possible now, and we are deciding that we're going to just reduce staff.

Now, on the other side of that, Ethan Mollick also commented on it, and his takeaway was that

hey this happens when an innovation like starts to be impacting what's happening and often it's a cover for making decisions that realizing that you uh that you have too many employees right like for your you're covering your desire to um uh to reduce staff by using the

accepted reason uh and there's somebody else that pointed out that elon came uh took over twitter massively cut staff yeah um and twitter still exists now i think that's an extreme case because when they massively cut stuff there was a lot that didn't work anymore for a

And the supply chain is a really good point, right?