Kaelin Moore

Stambovsky versus Ackley.

What year?

It's from 1991.

The court held that a house which the owner had previously advertised as being haunted by ghosts was legally haunted for the purpose of an action for recession brought by a subsequent purchaser of the house.

Basically, they were saying that because they had advertised as the house being haunted before the people had moved in, that they were legally required to tell the people that the house was haunted when they moved in.

Yeah, that makes sense.

But it became so now it's like taught in U.S.

law schools all over.

OK.

And it's like the case that people point to to be like, well, how much do you have to disclose about a house's like dark past when you're talking about?

Yeah.

It should have been burned down.

At a certain point, it's like, can you just get rid of the house?

No, it doesn't matter who, but no one's going to take on that financial burden.

Baby Maybe.

Called Baby Maybe.

Baby Maybe.

I did not read about that.

And the hands being tied behind his back.

It looks like someone was in the jail cell, maybe kind of did that to him.